[ Rules / FAQ ] [ meta / b / media / img / feels / hb / x ]

/media/ - Media

TV, Literature, Movies, Anime, Manga, Music, etc
Name
Email
Message

*Text* => Text

**Text** => Text

***Text*** => Text

[spoiler]Text[/spoiler] => Text

Image
Direct Link
Options NSFW image
Sage (thread won't be bumped)

Janitor applications are open


Check the Catalog before making a new thread.
Do not respond to maleposters. See Rule 7.
Please read the rules! Last update: 04/27/2021

419.jpg

Anonymous 20047

Im honestly surprised by how shamelessly capcom porncoded Lady D. I mean they are too big of a company to do cheap shit like this. I guess we can kiss the "female character thats interesting for a reason other than her sexuality" goodbye. The world really is going to shit.

Anonymous 20048

>>20047
>not scantily clad at all
>visible wrinkles
>poor complexion
>droopy breasts (though admittedly large)
>older adult face proportions
>not a slim figure

If she's porncoded then I don't think it's possible for a single female character not to be.

Anonymous 20049

>>20048
Did you play the game? Also she doesnt have droopy breast, they qre huge and revealed. She is much older than she looks, she must be like 50, but "looks good for her age" (i know shes much older, not the point). Her ass is also huge. Also her behavior and shit is very much porncoded. The way she sucks blood and shit is not "scary vampire" but "porn vampire".

Anonymous 20050

>>20049
>Also she doesnt have droopy breast, they qre huge and revealed.
They are droopy, I'm not going to argue this with you, as it's self-evident to anyone with any sense of reason that those are not the average "perky anime protagonist anti-gravity tits", and I already admitted they were large, so don't spin that as something I didn't acknowledge.
>She is much older than she looks, she must be like 50, but "looks good for her age" (i know shes much older, not the point).
Well duh you fucking idiot, but if she's fucking 50 and actually looks fucking 50 she's not your average porncoded design ala old-school Lara Croft.
>Also her behavior and shit is very much porncoded. The way she sucks blood and shit is not "scary vampire" but "porn vampire".
This is almost all modern vampires, you'd really have to push me to acknowledge the last mainstream "scary vampie" in media. At best I can conjure up Nosferatu in a movie, and Nosferatus in Bloodline: The Masquerade. This isn't unique to her.

If she is "porncoded" literally every female character in existence is "porncoded".

Anonymous 20051

>>20050
Are you a moid or something??? Just because something is realistic (her boobs) doesnt mean its not porn coded. "Perky anti gravity anime tits" isnt the only case where the creator focuses on the breasts too much.
Her look is that of a milf. A milf look is a porncoded look. Older women can be porncoded too and you're retarded if you dont see that.
Did you play the game or not? I cant believe a person that played the game (saw the gameplay) would say that her behavior same as most koder vampires. Most moder vampires arent shown sucking blood in the exact same way dick sucking looks.
Yes she is porncoded. I mean just look at her fans, all coomers. Theres literally nothing interesting about her except for her "femdom, mommy milkers" persona.

Anonymous 20052

>>20051
>Her look is that of a milf. A milf look is a porncoded look. Older women can be porncoded too and you're retarded if you dont see that.
I see we agree that there isn't a single female character design that isn't porncoded than, thank you for agreeing with me.

Anonymous 20053

She's definitely aimed at the growing everpresent "UNGA GIANT WOMAN FEMDOM ME" crowd but at least she's visibly an adult woman that is fully clothed. I have low standards for female rep at this point lol.

Anonymous 20054

ddf9f10b5704f1c82f…

Vampires in general are "porncoded" and have been for a long long time. Their whole gimmick is that the way they kill you looks like a hickey and is basically date rape. I think taking an archetype normally related to creepy moid sexuality and reinterpreting it they way they did is more fun and interesting than the usual "scantily clad vampire queen" like what'sherface in league of legends that games normally do.
And as an anecdote, my little sister's been playing RE:8 and her lust for Lady Dimitrescu is embarrassing, so it's not just moids they're appealing to.

Anonymous 20055

>>20050
I'm adding myself to the "not droopy" crowd. Breasts that large droop more at twenty than they made them do at fifty. Plus, from the bottom they look odd, like they're attached wrong, though from the top they look normal.

Anonymous 20056

>>20055
From the bottom you can't see as it's obscured by a pleated dress?

Anonymous 20057

1626445448819.jpg

Honestly, what is the appeal and why did Haru fall in love with Legoshi? I mean sure, he saved her from the mafia, but he's still an inconsiderate idiot who doesn't think about how his actions might hurt other people… are a lot of people really that into the "lovable doofus" type?

Anonymous 20058

>>20057
Is this supposed to be it's own thread and you accidentally responded to this one?

Anonymous 20059

>>20058
yes…

Anonymous 20078

sailor chris.jpg

Should female characters be covered up and inherently unattractive? Bayonetta and Dimitrescu are great, I love them and I do find them sexy. I don't think it's necessarily bad that some moids fap to them instead of the sobbing 13-year old anime schoolgirls as usual.

RE has always been campy as fuck, rarely scary, and I don't think that the bad jokes and sweaty himbos necessarily mitigate the dread you might feel trying to slip past regenerating abominations.

Anonymous 20081

I don't know about OP's example in particular, but essentially every major video game or animation studio is aware of the power of porn and will include at least some "porncoded" characters because Rule 34 is essentially free advertising. Blizzard is an especially notable culprit, for example.

Anonymous 20082

>>20081
How do you "porncode" based around Rule 34 when Rule 34 states that "if it exists, there will be porn of it"? If everything gets made into porn, how does one "porncode"?

Anonymous 20083

>>20082
nta but i suppose it goes like this:
>make the character in the original media to sexually appeal to as many people as possible using pornshit
>wait for famous vidya fan artists to notice your game
>have billions of r34shit made further promoting your vidya
>???
>coom

Anonymous 20086

>>20047
How are you surprised, did you play Darkstalkers or any of the past Resident Evils? They are all about sexy characters. Also it's a who cares from me

Anonymous 20091

I think she’s a good character. The more moids like femdom, the better.

Anonymous 20093

>>20091
Femdom doesn't really change the fact that they still think of us as sex objects.

Anonymous 20094

>>20093
We’ll femdom them into giving up their workplaces and asking permission to talk. I don’t care if respectful behavior will make their pp go up as long as the outcome profits us.

Anonymous 20095

joi.jpg

Just another waifu of the month. For a few weeks everybody talks about it, drools over it, draws porn of it, masturbates to it, and then forgets about it and moves on to the next.
It's all so tiresome.

Anonymous 20096

>>20094
>as the outcome profits us.
Does removing the rights from half the population really profit humanity as a whole?

Anonymous 20098

i haven't played this game but where in the hell are you guys getting "droopy"? her boobs look super perky considering how massive they made them from the pics i'm seeing.

>>20078
bayonetta is ridiculously oversexualized, it's insane. a good example of a female character is faith connors. bayonetta could've been femdom-y and really cool without being over the top, definitely a lot of male pandering there (please don't bring up the female designer thing, i do not care). bayonetta breaks my heart.

>>20094
true.

Anonymous 20100

>>20095
is this supposed to be ana de armas?

Anonymous 20101

>>20100
Yes. It's a shot from Blade Runner 2049.

Anonymous 20102

>>20098
Several of Kamiya's characters are over the top and it's part of the charm, taking that away would ruin them. There's nothing wrong or bad about Bayonetta being extremely sexualized.

Anonymous 20109

>>20096
If we don’t remove their rights, they’ll remove ours.

Anonymous 20110

While we're at it, i hate the new Lara Croft. They are trying to sell her as some feminist icon or whatever "Lara is no longer sexualized". They literally just made her incompetent. Shes just as sexualized, big boobs, the typical "sexy" face, same one that literally every single old blizzard woman has. And to top it all off, the new games suck. I wish they just made her realistic.

Anonymous 20111

>>20098
Also Jesse Faden. Probably cause shes based on a real person. Too bad Control is kinda boring.

Anonymous 20112

>>20110
I liked the Lara in Tomb Raider Legends, great game.

Anonymous 20113

>>20110
>Lara Croft boobs are still big
Not as comically large as they used to be, they look like C-cups at best, which is above average but not at all unrealistic or "pornstar" material.

What does a "realistic" Lara Croft look like to you personality-wise?

Anonymous 20114

>>20113
I feel like she was made to be a serious and competent character. She should be less emotional and scared. I mean for christs sake, someone that goes through adventures like her and kills people all the time shouldnt be as whiny and unrealistic. More mature, wiser, "job oriented" and less apprehensive.

Anonymous 20117

>>20109
They've already given us a lot more rights, than any other women in history, without giving up much of their own. I don't think that it's a stretch to believe more rights will come at the cost of theirs. ButwhatdoIknow?

Anonymous 20122

>>20047
Late to the thread and too busy to read it but I just want to say that it's sad that my favourite form of media to consume is made by degenerates to be marketed to degenerates and people just play it off like a meme as if it isn't horrific

Anonymous 20123

>>20114
So, like she was before?

Anonymous 20124

I know a lot of you like this character and I do too but I have to agree with OP. Dimitrescu falls extremely blatantly into the milf/mommy milkers/femdom gf category which has become exceedingly popular among moids these days looking for a mommy replacement who will tell them what to do and how to live and is also fuckable. Leftist moids especially love this trope because they are emasculated

None of this is a coincidence and to argue that all female character fall into a porn category is simply not true. That's mostly by accident. Dimitrescu ticks those porn category boxes like she was designed to tick them. Which she is. The absolutely deranged and cumbrained response to her proves my point. You had all these males on their main expressing their deep unhinged flaming desire to have her "fuck me with her giant coochie". There's porn of every female character ever but never have I seen this intense of a reaction towards a female character. She was designed to create buzz around the game and become a pornified meme. It's marketing

Anonymous 20125

>>20124
Pretty sure you're mistaking correlation for causation. The "mommy gf memes" were only really picking steam around a few months before Resident Evil VILLAGE had it's trailer. Unless you're arguing that Capcom designed Lady from the ground up to appeal to this (relatively) niche meme in only a matter of months, the more realistic answer is simply accidental good timing. I know it's in vogue around here to view all corporations and men as being a part of a giant conspiracy, but I'm sure that Lady was not designed in a matter of months because of a meme.

Now, that being said, maybe she was the main focus of the trailer because of the meme, but again, anyone using this argument makes corporations out to be far more competent than they are.

Anonymous 20142

>>20123
Pretty much. She didnt say much tho. But the way she looked was disturbing.

Anonymous 20224

who cares

Anonymous 20262

Shes disgusting. It makes me very uncomfortable to watch women who are this sexualized and played off as normal. I mean its obvious its a coomer pander.

Anonymous 20487

>>20110
>>20113
>>20114
theres 30 times more nu-lara porn than core design DD triangle boobs/7th gen lara
and yeah shes some kind of neurotic emotional psychopath in the new games, in the original game she murders like a handful of people and she was out of a dumb action movie waving a gun everywhere, now they make detailed animations of her shoving a knife or a machine gun into someones mouth and then blood flying everywhere like its maxpayne the death animations were originally dumb and silly like getting turned into gold, now its a horror movie

Anonymous 20489

>>20487
I think they got screwed over by the uncharted games. Uncharted has stolen the fun silly treasure hunting adventure movie niche and so tomb raider had no choice but to try and seem gritty and ""realistic"" to not compete with it.

Anonymous 20501

>>20489
they should have changed the gameplay, instead of adding mellodrama and animations of spikes going through her mouth

Anonymous 20513

I thought us feminists were all in favor of strong female characters wtf???

Anonymous 20526

>>20513
we are but the creators make it for the male gaze and it gets real annoying real fast when there's porn of the character everywhere. but what can we even do to prevent it. moids will sexualise anything ugh

Anonymous 20564

Being a woman and liking her has extreme pick me energy.

Anonymous 20569

>>20048
MILFs are a popular porn genre

Anonymous 20570

>>20096
if that half is moids, yes absolutely

Anonymous 20571

>>20569
And MILFs usually have revealing clothes in porn.

Anonymous 20572

>>20569
This just proves the point that moids will sexaulize everything, and thus everything is porncoded and thus nothing is porncoded.

Anonymous 20573

>>20571
there is absolutely tons of MILF porn that starts out with a woman in a tight dress that shows a ton of cleavage

Anonymous 20574

>>20573
So my point stands still that all women will be sexualized and thus everything is porncoded.

Anonymous 20575

>>20574
all women will be sexualized =/= everything is porncoded

Anonymous 20576

Hat In Time.jpg

>>20575
Alright, give me the reasoning that Lady Dimitrescu is porncoded, but Hat in Time kid is not when massive amounts of porn has been made of each.

Anonymous 20577

>>20576
something doesn't have to be porncoded for porn to be made of it

Anonymous 20578

>>20577
Okay, so as far as I can tell "porncoded" =/= sexaulization, nor does porncoded mean "coded for the production of porn". So what exactly is porncode used to describe then? And why does it not apply to every single female character design?

Anonymous 20579

>>20578
porncoded = designed to invoke association to porn

Anonymous 20580

>>20579
Okay, what female traits aren't associated with any genre of porn whatsoever?

Anonymous 20581

>>20580
there's a difference between a genre being made out of a female trait and a character specifically being designed with the intent to evoke said porn genre

Anonymous 20582

>>20581
And that difference is?

Anonymous 20583

>>20582
one is specifically designed to evoke a porn genre

Anonymous 20584

>>20583
Sounds like circular logic.
>one is specifically designed to evoke a porn genre because it is specifically designed to evoke a porn genre
I'm not getting the difference. How would you confirm if a design was or was not specifically designed to evoke a porn genre?

Anonymous 20585

>>20584
by not being a retard? i don't know
there is porn of hat kid but she clearly wasn't designed with the intent to be associated with porn, whereas a character like etna from disgaea was blatantly designed to pander to pedophiles

Anonymous 20586

>>20584
>>20585
when you look at hat kid you don't think "this looks like porn" unless you're a pedophile, when you look at the stupid vampire hag you are immediately reminded of porn because she is designed to evoke that association

Anonymous 20587

>>20585
>there is porn of hat kid but she clearly wasn't designed with the intent to be associated with porn
Why is it clear?
>whereas a character like etna from disgaea was blatantly designed to pander to pedophiles
Why? Because she wore scantily clad clothes? I can see the reasoning there, but we fall into the back into the problem with Lady Dimitrescu
>she isn't wearing scanty clothing
>she's modest by all current fashion standards
>she's inhumanly pale
>saggy skin
>slightly saggy breasts
With the only consolation being that she has large breasts. I can agree with you Etna is "porncoded" if that's how we're using the word, but if Hat Kid isn't porn coded, then neither is Lady Dimitrescu, by your standards.

Anonymous 20588

>>20586
>when you look at the stupid vampire hag you are immediately reminded of porn because she is designed to evoke that association
But I don't. I see a tall pale vampire lady. That's about as far from my mind as being pornographic as hat kid. If she were waltzing around in a bikini maybe.

Anonymous 20589

>>20587
>>20588
you just have to not be a retard i guess
>she isn't wearing scanty clothing
>she's modest by all current fashion standards
she's wearing a tight dress with giant cleavage, retard
>she's inhumanly pale
as if that isn't a beauty standard of women for the demographic being targeted
>saggy skin
>slightly saggy breasts
literally staples of MILF body types, retard

Anonymous 20590

>>20589
she's also a giantess, another genre.

Anonymous 20591

>>20589
>she's wearing a tight dress with giant cleavage, retard
And this isn't normal nowadays? Unless the majority of women on college campuses I interact with are all porncoded and I just didn't notice.
>as if that isn't a beauty standard of women for the demographic being targeted
Please post me one MILF video with someone with chalk white skin. I'll wait.
>literally staples of MILF body types, retard
You are literally the one that stated
>there's a difference between a genre being made out of a female trait

With these being your arguments, in that case, Hat Kid is also porncoded if those are the types of loose associations you're allowed to make. Thank you for clarifying.

Anonymous 20592

>>20590
>Being tall is now porncoded
I am still not getting the rules of this game.

Anonymous 20593

>>20592
I fall back to this problem yet again.

>there's a difference between a genre being made out of a female trait and a character specifically being designed with the intent to evoke said porn genre

What is the difference and how could you tell? How is this any different from how moids usually sexaulize us?

Anonymous 20595

>>20592
she's like 9 and a half feet tall, not just tall. her boobs aren't even remotely saggy though, they're just massive.

Anonymous 20597

>>20591
many heteros porncode themselves for male attention, yes
>>20593
you just have to not be retarded sorry you couldn't pass that bar

Anonymous 20598

>>20595
>she's like 9 and a half feet tall, not just tall. her boobs aren't even remotely saggy though, they're just massive.
Well in that case it isn't evoking MILF porn according to >>20589

>>20597
>you just have to not be retarded sorry you couldn't pass that bar
I'd be glad if you get help me stop being retarded though, then maybe there would be one more person who agrees with you.

As far as I can tell though, it's impossible to make a none porncoded character
>character is black
>porncoded
>character is asian
>porncoded
>character has large breasts
>porncoded
>character has small breasts
>porncoded
>character wears a modest outfit
>porncoded
>character wears a bikini
>porncoded

What female traits are not in fact "porncoded" for moids?

Anonymous 20599

>>20598
you're missing the point you retard, it's not being part of a group that there are porn genres about, it's being specifically designed with the intent to evoke that porn genre

Anonymous 20600

>>20599
And how would you know whether or not a character was specifically designed to evoke a porn genre? If a moid specifically adds a black woman because he likes fapping to black woman, that's porncoded, yes? In that case, does a moid who does not like fapping to black woman designing a black character not count as porncoding? It's purely on the intent part?

Anonymous 20601

>>20600
by not being a blind retard
a black character made by a jungle fever coomer is designed differently than a normal black character

Anonymous 20602

>>20601
In what ways?

Anonymous 20603

>>20602
the one designed by the coomer retard is designed to look like porn
how fucking hard is this to understand you fucking tard

Anonymous 20604

>>20603
>how fucking hard is this to understand you fucking tard
Incredibly according to your observations, could you provide any examples then? Could you show me the difference between a porn coded character and a "normal character" if just having female traits isn't a part of it?

Anonymous 20605

>>20604
I literally already gave you an example

Anonymous 20606

>>20605
You mean Etna? The difference is how scantily clad they are then?

Anonymous 20607

>>20606
it's not about scantily clad you retard, it's about one looking like porn and the other not looking like porn
hat kid doesn't look like porn
etna and vampire hag look like porn
it's not that fucking hard

Anonymous 20608

>>20607
Why does Hat Kid not look like porn? Some moids apparently see her as pornographic, doesn't that mean by definition she looks like porn?

Anonymous 20609

>>20608
if you need to ask why a normal cartoon kid isn't pornographic then you're too retarded beyond explanation

Anonymous 20610

>>20609
Well, if your evidence is so obvious that retards can't grasp it perhaps your evidence isn't actually obvious. If you ever manage to give me a way to verify it other than "just look", then please feel free to enlighten. As far as I can tell I am still stuck having no reason to believe Hat Kid isn't porncoded according to your standards.

Anonymous 20611

>>20610
or more logically, retards are just too fucking retarded to understand basic concepts
compare a screenshot of hatkid to a clothed drawing of a child by shadman, if you can't tell the difference then you are either genuinely fucking retarded, a pedophile, a disingenuous LARPing moid, or most likely all of the above

Anonymous 20612

Shadman Child.png

>>20611
>clothed image by a child by Shadman
Okay I found one, what is your point?

Anonymous 20614

PajamaKid.jpg

>>20613
>Do as instructed
<you're a moid retard
Sounds like something a moid who was losing an argument would say.

Anonymous 20618

8656886544.jpg

>>20048
>>20050
For the love of good stop basing your standards off of anime and IG models with bolted on breast implants. No person who has ever interacted with natural breasts would call these "droopy"

Anonymous 20619

>>20618
>For the love of good stop basing your standards off of anime and IG models with bolted on breast implants. No person who has ever interacted with natural breasts would call these "droopy"
That's just it though, they could have given her anime/IG modles bolted on tits, but didn't. So we can actually make the comparison because they spent man hours making that change. The comparison is 100% valid.

Anonymous 20640

She's obviously a walking "giantess mommy" fetish.

Anonymous 20657

>>20047
According to a casual glance over at /d/ to be a "giantess" a character has to be 38 feet tall, or, in their words "large enough that an adult man fits underneath the characters foot."

Anonymous 20660

why are you guys arguing about whether or not she's giantess territory? she's not exactly a giantess if you consider the type that involves tiny, tinkerbell sized men crawling up a giant's vagina, but her appeal is just broad enough to capture the interest of guys who are into extremely tall women (likely large overlap with giantess weirdos, giantess shit probably starts out with an obsession over large human woman and then as most male paraphilias go, it becomes more extreme) and also men who aren't necessarily into huge women and are just into big hulking mommy milkers shit. she was probably designed to appeal to the widest amount of men considering. most moids don't just have one strictly retarded fetish, keep in mind.

Anonymous 20663

>>20659
9 ft 6 isn't extremely tall, it's not even humanly tall. Add on top of that being a "MILF", add on top of that being a "vampire" and I just don't see how anyone could have intentionally "porncoded" a character for porn that has fetishists in the range of 10s.

>>20661

Oh you came back, thank you.

Anonymous 20665

>>20660
>most moids don't just have one strictly retarded fetish, keep in mind.
No, but moids autistic enough to have fetishes like "giantess" or "vampire" certainly are.

I'm imagining most moids clammored onto the "mommy milkers" meme because it was just that, a meme, with a high profile release and that they didn't actually find the character attractive.

Gelbooru stats support this, with Lady Dimistrecu having only 500 entries while 2B (another video game character with a notably high porn fetishistic release) has 80k.

Anonymous 20666

>>20663
are you saying monsters don't appeal to mommy milkers fetishists or big (tall) women fetishists? whether or not she's an actual giantess is irrelevant, the point is that she occupies a specific territory that has broad appeal to a few different male fetishes, all of which can and do exist at the same time. she's not specific enough to not have broad appeal, but she also, at the same time, has enough stereotypical characteristics of a particular porn. there's a reason why she's so popular with men. again, paraphilic men tend to have many different fetishes. is her being a vampire supposed to be a turnoff? men are literally super into any vaguely humanoid shit, especially gamers.

Anonymous 20667

>>20665
>Gelbooru stats support this, with Lady Dimistrecu having only 500 entries while 2B (another video game character with a notably high porn fetishistic release) has 80k.
who? she literally just came out. when did the other character come out?

Anonymous 20669

>>20665
>No, but moids autistic enough to have fetishes like "giantess" or "vampire" certainly are.
no, that's not how paraphilic behaviors work in men. like literally they tend to have a shit ton of fetishes, and just in general men are stimulated by almost anything.

Anonymous 20672

3679744578997533.j…

>>20663
>9 ft 6 isn't extremely tall, it's not even humanly tall.
>it's not even humanly tall.
Will you basement dwelling moids get off my board. 9'6" is taller than the tallest person ever recorded, real life is not a fucking video game.

Anonymous 20673

>bring actual stats to the table
>now everybody wants to have a reasonable discussion about whether a character is actually possible.

Noted for next time.

Anonymous 20674

>>20672
At the point where man has an autistic specific number of fetishes he wants all of those fetishes at the same time. Just browse /d/ for evidence.

>>20672
It's impossible for a human to be 9ft 6in, at least by all current known humans.

Anonymous 20675

Thread is just full of miners assuming they know what's popular with moids when they just got memed to death. Next you'll tell me that Astolfo is "just as popular" as some other anime trash of the week.

Anonymous 20690

But I like her.
And they’re not all porncoded, what about the puppeteer anon??

Anonymous 20702

retard

Anonymous 20709

>>20689
Okay ESL-chan.

Anonymous 21152

porncoded=character I don't like

Anonymous 21155

>>21147
I agree that the Japanese generally have 0 sense of nuance (especially for bigger titles) but I don't know what's so wrong about having a flashy game. Unless it's supposed to be set in the real modern-day world, then it gets stupid quickly.

Anonymous 21164

>>21155
>nuance
sorry I meant subtlety

Anonymous 21200

>>20110
I got REALLY sick of her scared-girl-in-the-woods thing by the second game. Bitch you blew that guy's head off with his own shotgun. How are you still not making one liners?

Anonymous 21269

>>20048
are you single? do you have trouble keeping relationships?
you clearly dont get it

Anonymous 21270

>>21269
I clearly don't, as I don't view every person walking on the street as porncoded, yet any arguments posed in this thread make it impossible for anyone not to be porncoded.

Anonymous 21271

>>20047
HEY FAT!

Anonymous 21280

1.png

Think about this: the male character equivalent to her is Edward Cullen.
Having said this, they could have made Lady D shorter, fatter, and a bit uglier. That would have been more realistic.
>>20580
They could have made Lady D a 6 feet tall middle aged lady without pronounced curves and a gaunt face, Katie Hopkins would have been a great model for that.

Anonymous 21282

>>21280
>Think about this: the male character equivalent to her is Edward Cullen.
Why is Edward Cullen porncoded? Does just being a vampire make him porncoded?
>Having said this, they could have made Lady D shorter, fatter, and a bit uglier. That would have been more realistic.
And this would improve the character?
>They could have made Lady D a 6 feet tall middle aged lady without pronounced curves and a gaunt face, Katie Hopkins would have been a great model for that.
>pic related
Looks like the archetype that most hentai artists use for school teachers.

Anonymous 21283

>>21281
Good looking or in any case a character which attracts gazes for various reasons.

Anonymous 21284

>>21283
>Good looking or in any case a character which attracts gazes for various reasons.
So a character has to be ugly to not be porncoded? Only ugly characters are allowed?

Anonymous 21286

1.jpg

>>21284
Between a 0/10 and a 10/10 there's some 4 5 and 6 which are in the middle
Porncode those if you can

Anonymous 21287

>>20047
Uh oh, the incel thinks it has an opinion worth reading.

Anonymous 21288

>>21286
Isn't that what Lady D is? She looks like a solid 6/10 with those nasolabial folds and pale skin.
>but she's a vampire!
Still doesn't look good. Maybe if they brightened her face up like in the pic you posted.

Anonymous 21290

realistic tall vam…

>>21288
>nasolabial folds
I thought it was just a meme, but they actually are a thing.
Without makeup Lady D would be a 4/10.
You will note how they also gave her an apple shaped body, a fridge body wouldn't have worked as well but would have been more realistic.

Anonymous 21294

Spoiler

>porncoded

is this some new twitterzoomer slang?

anyway, video games are made by men for men. we can complain all we want but nothing will change until women start to make their own games and that wont happen in our lifetime.

Anonymous 21300


Anonymous 21329

Screw that, they snubbed Heisenberg



[Return] [Catalog]
[ Rules / FAQ ] [ meta / b / media / img / feels / hb / x ]