1514508913083 (1).…
A world without males Anonymous 22715
Let's pretend men don't exist and we could reproduce on our own!
How would things be like?
Do you think the world would be less violent? Less capitalist? Are any things you think that would be worse? What would be better?
Anonymous 22716
>>22715Hmm, hard to say. There would probably be less violent and sexual crimes.
A lot of women world leaders do pretty good, Merkel for example. But there are some bad ones, too, like the Myanmar leader.
A lot of modern technology was made by men, but one could argue that women have been discouraged from academic pursuits because of the patriarchy. I know that may sound overtly SJW, but it's worth entertaining I think.
Not really sure what kind of conclusion to draw.
Regardless, I like duality in my life currently. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Anonymous 22717
anatole.jpg
I know I say I hate men a lot and I still do, but the world would be really boring without men. How about a world without ugly men, or a world where all men are enslaved instead?
Anonymous 22718
>>22717How would we enslave them though?
Anonymous 22719
Instead of men there would be butch lesbians and nothing would change
Anonymous 22721
Screen Shot 2018-0…
>>22718We would have to keep the male population low for it to be viable. A good way to reduce the male population while keeping the female population high is having a mandatory male draft and inciting war. However, the change of power would need to occur relatively quickly, as within a few generations, the ratio of men to women would steadily return to 1:1. I won't get into how to start a war as it is something that would naturally occur without our intervention. The main point is taking advantage of such a situation, so let's assume for now that a war has begun. How do the women in the warring territory gain power? The majority of change would need to occur silently. We would need the passage of laws supporting women over men while there were significantly less male voters.
Anonymous 22723
I would think the world would be much more peaceful. Much less crime. However we would probably advance more slowly due to being less competitive. With too much peace things become stagnant.
I dislike men and avoid them for the most part, but at the very least I can appreciate them for the things they've made.
Anonymous 22726
it would be a cool world some r9k bloke would probably get off to being his fetish
Anonymous 22728
If all men suddenly disappeared the first thing that would happen would be billions of women following them into death as all the infrastructure of modern society falls apart with no men to maintain it.
After that I think the few surviving women would form primitive tribes. The centers of these tribes would be women who know how to hunt and forage and otherwise survive on their own. These capable women would basically become the new men, leading and taking care of other women. Only, I'm not sure women would want that role. Men were happy to be a tribe leader and take care of a bunch of women because it meant he'd get to have sex with all of them. But on I don't really see that same motivation working for your average woman.
If the tribes do manage to survive, assuming they managed to form at all, things would probably then be pretty boring for the rest of time as the women don't really build or create new things, just survive day today. Until some global eco shift or huge scale natural disaster rendered the Earth inhospitable for humans and killed off the last of them.
Anonymous 22737
>>22728Amen.
I don't understand this hate for men.
A world without them would have a fast ending for the most of us.
The survivors would die out because we need men.
Wanting man entslaved or their numbers forcefully hold down is terrible and makes women who want that not better than the redpill guys.
I met as many bad men as i met bad women.
Anonymous 22738
>>22715“Less Capitalist”
Hoo, boy.
“Less violent”.
It would be worse. Girls bully girls relentlessly; women sabotage each other in the workplace constantly - if all the social capital and prestige was solely among women it would intensify by at least an order of magnitude. I have many brothers and while they are much, much more
physical they fight much less.
Anonymous 22739
A bit off-topic, but I want everyone to die out.
We are all awful and there's no point being here. I'd kms if I wasn't a coward and a fellow human addicted to the sensory interest generated on earth.
Anonymous 22742
>>22721Maybe some kind of highly infective smallpox or influenza strain with virulence factors somehow activated by male specific features like presence of an SRY gene product
Anonymous 22743
>>22739Who are you to decide whether I'm awful and deserving of death?
Anonymous 22747
>>22719laughed in a library from this
Anonymous 22748
>>22738Pretty much this. There would be a much stricter hierarchy that is decided by social status (basically a huge popularity contest). A lot of people forget that girls can be cruel and judgy even the ones that claim that “everyone is beautiful just that way theyare and we shouldn’t judge them!”. Although I think there would be a lot less competiveness and obsession over looks. Lots of girls dress or do their make up a certain way to appeal to guys, but now that men are gone, they have no reason to unless they just like dressing like that for themselves.
Anonymous 22752
If I lost the men in my life I'd literally jump off a bridge the same day. I don't get this hatred for men.
Anonymous 22753
>>22752Me neither, I think a better question to ask would be "what would life be like if we didn't have to reproduce" I think that way a lot of bad things about men would disappear
Anonymous 22754
>>22728>all the infrastructure of modern society falls apart with no men to maintain it.>women don't really build or create new things,You sound male and/or idiotic, sorry.
Anonymous 22774
I can't compete in a Stacy World and I'm not a lesbian so I'd probably go be a nun and join a hermitage with other social outcast women for platonic company. Could be comfy.
Anonymous 22813
monjas-usa.jpg
There are communities doing that just fine. (With strict discipline)
Anonymous 22814
>>22813being a cloistered nun sounds like it would be very chill tbh. i'm 100% for this idea.
>>22770i know grown-ass men who can't even operate a washing machine, you really think those guys would be 'just fine'?
when my granddad's wife died he ate out for the next thirty years because he refused to learn how to cook. his elderly (female) neighbor felt so sorry for him that she would come over every week to clean his house because he refused to do it. yeah, sure, men will be fine on their own. just let their stubborn asses live in filth, ill health, and misery.
Anonymous 22818
Kneipe_Corps_Suevi…
>>22814The point is that without any women enforcing privacy, the lowlife men would just be swept up by other men who have their shit together. They'd be used as literal minions and probably enjoy it because they don't have to worry about much and are taken care of.
Men in a nutshell. It only needs a handful of tricksters/schemers/"wizards" who have oversight and some others who are bold and charismatic.
Around here we also have some concepts like that where "homeless" University students are swept up (and given a cheap home) by fraternities who are more or less civilized but teach them how to function at least in basic concepts, until the older ones graduate and get own homes and then teach the young ones in occasional meetings.
I guess if it just was one house with everyone living in it forever it would become the epitome of barbaric, but at least it would work
somehow Anonymous 22821
1946._SX360_QL80_T…
>>22818idk where you live, but where i'm from, fraternity brothers are regarded as scumbags. they're arrogant, inconsiderate, throw loud parties and don't clean up after themselves, and they bully the younger members of the frat.
plus, most of them
don't learn to function even in those basic concepts, at least not in the long run. they get their degrees, marry their girlfriends, and then go straight back to being as messy and lazy as they want because they have a domestic servant to take care of them again.
like the frat communities that you're describing sound fine to live in, but i think you're really underestimating the number of pic related that exist. those lowlife men are lowlifes usually because they have no skills, social or otherwise, and i find it hard to imagine that the other men who have their shit together would pick them up and transform their lives without them being able to demonstrate some sort of value.
Anonymous 22827
The thread topic seems to have slid towards a men-only planet.
Men without women would create some sort of cannibalistic human sacrifice oriented culture where dying in war is considered ideal and funerary customs involve turning their skins into war drums and where human bone scrimshaw is the most common form of art. On the plus side there would be personal jetpacks and flying cars, on the downside there would be no license restrictions or insurance for either, fuel efficiency would be considered a cowardly concept and seatbelts would not exist even as a concept. Even our current world has detonated more than 2,150 atomic bombs, mostly more or less safely in test sites. In Man World, and I'm reasonably sure no man on earth would disagree, they'd have easily tripled that number, but a nontrivial percentage of those would not have been tests. Only 4 United States presidents have died by assassination in the current world, 2 shot by far right conservatives (Lincoln and Garfield) and 2 shot by far left communists (McKinley and Kennedy); only one of those was shot after women gained the vote. We can probably quadruple that number for Man World, and without women's civilizing influence on radical leftwing politics illegalism and Propaganda of the Deed such as assassination would be much more common political activities. The Cold War would have gone nuclear and surviving nations would have functioning Orion nuclear engine spaceships, which they would use in their resource wars where they struggle to get control of the solar system's remaining fissile materials so that they can win the next set of nuclear wars. Feminine concepts such as restraint and public order are the only reason there are stop signs, speed limits, and blood alcohol level restrictions on the roads. The whole nightmarish scenario would look a lot like Warhammer 40,000, but with everyone acting like Orkz. I mean heck that's the whole idea of Warhammer's Orkz, there's a reason Orkz are asexually reproducing fungi, men without women and without biological restraints.
Physically, if men still needed a male partner to reproduce with, I don't really know. Men are much more attracted to pale skin than women are, and much more attracted to blue or light colored eyes. They'd probably be larger and have tougher bones and stronger muscles due to the constant personal warfare of all against all that is the natural state on their planet. And since they'd be cannibals they'd probably have better digestive adaptations to drinking blood.
So basically gay vampires with jetpacks.
Anonymous 22829
>>22827i think you just really like warhammer
Anonymous 22834
>>22827Man World sounds fucking badass
Anonymous 22835
>>22834bear in mind it would also be extremely gay in a prison kind of way
Anonymous 22836
>>22835How so? Are you sure? Men are actually more empathetic than women in terms of morals and ideals, for example all great moral undertakings have come from men (ending slavery, rule of law, etc). Women are pretty vicious and don't really care either way. I think a world consisting of men would be highly moral and just. If Man World has the same demographics as now, Europeans would just dominate the Earth and without women to impede them they would never let their empire fall. I don't think it would be as warlike as you claim because one tribe or group would quickly pull ahead of all others and maintain stability, much like in our world (Pax Britannica and then Pax Americana).
Anonymous 22843
>>22836>men are more emphatic and have better morals because they ended slavery.That's not how it works, there were and still are plenty of men that didn't want slavery to end. It's not like woman we're be able to end slavery anyway because they had no power to do so.
Anonymous 22855
>>22716>Merkel>a good leaderthats funny m8
Anonymous 22864
>>22829Warhammer is a direct reflection of the male soul. To create a perfect male android we could build a sexbot and train its neural net on Warhammer source materials and pornography, and the result would be functionally indistinguishable from a biological male. The only question is why on Earth anyone would want to do that.
Anonymous 22893
>>22855>muh muslimsGermany is objectively one of, if not, the most economically successful European country.
Anonymous 22897
>>22893Solely because of the German people, and not because of their leadership.
Anonymous 22901
i work in a female-dominated industry (i'm surrounded by women and talking to women all day) and overall it's a very pleasant environment with little to none of the backstabbing and gossip-mongering that men imagine would happen in a world without them. if anyone is unpleasant it's usually in a way that's stand-offish rather than outright bitchy.
then you have male-dominated spaces such as fraternities like
>>22818 mentioned which produce some of the most obnoxious and rude specimens of humanity that i've ever encountered.
uncanny coincidence, huh
Anonymous 22915
>>22897I'd like to see you explain how Germany is an Anarchist utopia, Anon. Also haven't all the leaders of Germany been German people?
Yes, yes they have. Anonymous 22956
>>22915>random ridiculous strawmanOk retard.
As long as you at least somewhat harness the German people's industriousness, you will have a successful country. The particulars of their leadership is irrelevant and they would obviously be a billion times better off without Merkel and with someone who instead was NOT trying to slowly genocide them.
Anonymous 22960
>>22901i don’t think backstabbing and politics and gossip is a male or female thing, it’s a shitty internal culture thing. we’re too quick to attribute shittiness to what people are rather than who they are, i think
Anonymous 23229
>>23220Austrians are, in fact, Germans.
Anonymous 23641
It would be the most miserable place ever.
What a horrible thread.
Anonymous 23646
I think a new gender binary would form around masculinity/femininity and it'd be much the same as it is now, only not as based in biology.
Anonymous 23649
>>23641I agree. This thread was probably made as b8 to make the site look bad
Anonymous 23652
>>23641>>23649Do you actually believe that?
This site is built around not having men post here. Why would you intentionally seek out an online society without males if you think a real world society without males would be miserable?
Anonymous 23656
>>23649it isn't bait, i made it because i was bored and the chan was slow. i don't hate males but i agree with
>>23652 Anonymous 23658
I like boys too much, I enjoy their company and I think they are cute
but all the alpha males and incels and "nice guys" can die off thX
Anonymous 23660
>>23652Not her, but just because I like to post there doesn’t mean I have a desire for all men to disappear. Posting here is something temporary, then I go back to reality.
Anonymous 23665
>>23658What about the nice guys without the quotes?
Anonymous 23667
>>23665well no, i appreciate actually nice people…
Anonymous 23736
>>23652Yeah, I believed it until OP stepped in to correct me. I didn’t specifically seek out this site because it’s female-oriented. I found it off lc and thought there’d be like-minded people here (there are).
I agree with
>>23658 , I’d miss the company of qt guys. and making sweeping generalizations is dumb
Anonymous 25223
>>22893Because Germany had the richest country in history rebuild it and dump money into it as a bulwark against the Eastern Bloc
bing Marshal Plan
Anonymous 25227
>>22716Aung Suu Kyi did nothing wrong
Anonymous 25323
>>22721I think a better solution would be to have a more or less polygamous society, where you and your girlfriends share one really really hot guy and the rest of the men work manual labor jobs somewhere far removed from society. That would keep just enough men around to keep things interesting but not too many. They wouldn't have any political power obviously.
Anonymous 25328
>>22715I think less sex crime would happen but battery and murder would skyrocket without men to vent on.
Maybe less war, but I have no real evidence myself to suggest why that would be true.
Traffic would be worse.
I think mostly everything else would be cool though.
Anonymous 25344
>>25328>murder would skyrocketWh-what?
Men are responsible for the overwhelming majority of murders right now.
http://www.unodc.org/documents/gsh/pdfs/2014_GLOBAL_HOMICIDE_BOOK_web.pdf(p. 136)
Although in the Virgin Islands it's 50/50, so we might want to stay away from there.
What do you mean by men to vent on? To get angry at or abuse? Are we sure most women beat their husbands? I have doubts.
Anonymous 25349
>>25344When I have a problem with other women I can't vent about it with other women because they'll gossip about it and I'll get shit on down the line about it so I talk to a guy friend or bf about it since they barely care about it.
A world without men is just a time bomb of escalating frustrations, our murder rates would match men's in a short amount of time
Anonymous 25350
>>25349the men i know are the ones who spread the most gossip, but then again, I hang out with mostly men, and they are very bitchy types of men
Anonymous 25353
>>25349It sounds like you just know unhealthy women and have a healthy bf lmao
>>25350Most men I know are also backhanded and into gossip and drama. I worked with mainly (straight) men for a few years in a fast food restaurant of all places places and the backstabbing was
unreal. I didn't expect it.
Anyway it's more an unhealthy-person thing than a woman-thing; men betray each other to get ahead all the time. Men can also be manipulative.
The cure for this is to just be honest about your distaste for an individual when it's safe to do so. If it's a boss or something, complain to someone not employed there so they can't ruin your job. ez
Anonymous 25354
>>25353>backhandedI meant underhanded obvs kek
Before I get called out for stupidity.
Anonymous 25356
>>25353Just seems to be a tendency no matter where I go. Not to say its always that way, but more like a rule of thumb
Anonymous 25543
idk op, life without a power grid, indoor plumbing and mechanised agriculture sounds kinda uncomfy, maybe deadly
as much as I hate to admit it, they kind of run things around here
Anonymous 25544
>>25543Not for long.
t. aspiring tradeswoman
Anonymous 25558
>>25543How do you think things functioned while men were fighting during the world wars? Begone, robot.
Anonymous 25560
The world's population would return to a sustainable number. Women would have children when they were ready, instead of being forced into marriages (child marriages, arranged marriages, shotgun weddings) and then the societal expectation that once married, they have to start having kids. They would be able to enjoy their youth/careers and wouldn't think about children until later in life when only one or two children will be possible anyway. The quality of life for those children will be vastly, vastly improved as older mothers will already have large savings and houses purchased. Older mothers will also be more mature, therefore superior to younger mothers and only very serious mothers would go through with carrying a child. There will be no accidental children as mothers will have to go through an artificial insemination process. They won't have to suffer from rape and the pressure religious organisations and families put on them to birth and keep the child. People wonder why women in impoverished countries "keep having children" when they can't afford them, but they never seem to ask why their fucking trash husbands keep impregnating them and making them suffer more. With a reduced world population, the lives of everyone will greatly improve because we will have more food, better access to essential facilities and we would be doing less damage to the earth via climate change, deforestation, pollution etc. It would also be a much safer environment for women to raise children in. Imagine letting your kids play on the street until dark because you don't have to fear kidnappings, murderers or paedophiles as much as the majority of violent crimes are committed by men.
People who wonder "B-But what will we do without big, strong, handsome men?" are men who feel threatened by the idea. Just like they're threatened by feminism and the concept that women can live, work, travel, have kids, make decisions etc. without them. It fucking terrifies them that something they desire to control so much, can actually survive just fine without their influence. Actually, thrive since women who don't marry are happier and less stressed. Do people honestly think that men are the only group of people who can climb a telephone poll or plunge a toilet? Sorry, but society without men would be a utopia and if it bothers you, maybe try to be a more useful member of society or treat women better if you want people to start seeing it as a dystopia.
Anonymous 25561
>>25560Older parents are more likely to produce children with genetic or chromosomal abnormalities, and screening tests for such defects aren't perfect. We're getting better at it of course but they aren't perfect.
Anonymous 25562
>>25561Older as in early 30s, not 40s.
Anonymous 25564
>>25563The average age to have a first child in my country is 31.
Anonymous 25568
>>25564This is pretty characteristic of Western Europe I think. When you stratify the US population by graduation from a four year college, you arrive at a similar mean value for the age of women at the time of their first child's birth.
Certainly I believe women must possess reproductive autonomy, but in order to make informed decisions we must also recognize that our biology is optimized for a different sort of life history than those common in wealthy post-industrial societies.
Anonymous 25569
>>25563Don't people on (the functional end of) the spectrum often gravitate toward STEM careers? We'd need more STEM girls in this world, so that's fine. This study also didn't seem to mention severity of the disorder, although I only skimmed over it.
Anyway, if that table is right and say every woman has a baby in the 30-34 range with older male sperm even, so ~14/1000 babies had autism…that's only 1.4% of people having autism. Right now it's 1/59 people (in the U.S.), 1.7%. Things wouldn't be too different.
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/67/ss/ss6706a1.htm Anonymous 25662
>>25560The world would be so much safer. It's hilarious when guys try to use the b-but we protect you excuse for why we would need them. Protect us from what? Other barbaric male thugs?
Anonymous 25836
>>22814>i know grown-ass men who can't even operate a washing machineThis is dumb though because I can reverse that and say i know women that can't even operate a nuclear power plant. Teaching that halfwit man to using a washing machine takes like 5 minutes, but teaching that woman how to operate a nuclear plant isn't going to be quick. In OP's scenario, men would outlast women because they already dominate almost every field, even the ones that are majority female.
Anonymous 25841
I'd honestly rather live in a less scientifically advanced society than one filled with violent psychopaths.
Just weighing the pros and cons of each society, for me personally this is what I'd prefer.
Anonymous 25853
>>25836>This is dumb though because I can reverse that and say i know women that can't even operate a nuclear power plant.this is such a horrible comparision, anon, a nuclear power plant takes more than one person to run unlike running a load of laundry, kek
>Teaching that halfwit man to using a washing machine takes like 5 minutes, but teaching that woman how to operate a nuclear plant isn't going to be quick. nta but…like…that's the point…the simple task of laundry can't be completed by a man. once again, a power plant isn't run by a singular person, kek
Anonymous 26179
>>22715okay, I know I'm going to take everyone's hatred here.
I just want to clarify some points.
Many of the social networks have been invented by men, but in the end those who use them most are women.
For example Instagram, a platform to share your lifestyle, and suddenly a group of girla just want attention through likes.
Would you really like to live in a less technological world but without the need to be dealing with the problems of men?
I also believe that most of the problems in the world are caused by men.
I am not against anyone's opinion, you are all right in everything.
Anonymous 26181
>>26179Exceedingly few of the problems in the world are caused by people.
Anonymous 65474
We should live like elephants. Elephants are based. Female only tribes who raise kids except young males are kicked out at a certain age to live with older dudes and far away from us. We meet only a few times a year to fuck the fittest male. Problem solved.
Anonymous 65477
>>65474Moids think they are more important to a society than us but that is not true if more women flew to other societies because they didnt like their own that society would collapse and would be unable to keep new generations going. They underestimate the unique power of women which is one of the strongest ones if not the strongest in biological physical existence.
We can make a society resurge with 30 women and 2 qt racoon moids if we wanted. But they can't maintain the opposite 30 moids and 2 women, they would go apeshit and start killing each other. Women are naturally more valuable scientifically proven.
So I think an anti-feminist society should get killed by their own women. Muslim women should emigrate more to better societies for them than Muslim moids. And let the muslim world and indoctrination die by womanly disinterest, they wont be capable of making new generations if they fly out thats the best punishment you can bestow on shitty societies. Death by loneliness.
Anonymous 65486
>How would things be like?I think that stronger women would take on the male roles in society (e.g., leading other women). And also the care of the babies would be shared.
>Do you think the world would be less violent?Absolutely. That would be the best part. If men disappear, so does violence.
>Less capitalist? Yes, men are the ones who like to compete with each other and accumulate wealth (power). A world without men would be more cooperative.
>Are any things you think that would be worse? I think women lack ambition and therefore a world without men would develop more slowly.
>What would be better?Less violence and more cooperation.
>>65474It is like this in almost all the animal kingdom.
Anonymous 65538
>>65486This is the realistic answer.
Anonymous 65560
As in they just vanished, rapture style?
Get ready for every non-European nation to completely collapse and swarm the last bastions of technologically advanced civilisation who had at least some women trained and educated in fields necessary to maintain and develop core infrastructure.
We have practically entire continents where women are unable to drive, sail or fly, so all transportation shuts down. Food, energy and materiel stops moving entirely for almost the entire planet.
Hundreds of millions die from starvation as farms come to a halt and their produce cannot be distributed more than a week's journey by foot away.
Yet more die to disease as, again, entire continents with a handful of women trained in medicine. The grand exodus from Africa and Asia carry diseases wiped-out in the West and epidemics spread.
Strategic reserves of fuel deplete as oil fields burn out of control or simply sit idle and it becomes a race for a handful of scientists, engineers and machinists in European countries to train a massive workforce to fill the gaps in gas, solar and turbine manufacture.
Hundreds of thousands of women choose suicide, rather than suffer through the loss of fathers, brothers, sons, husbands ect.
Militaries, border patrols and even police are entirely depopulated without enough women with the disposition to fill even the higher ranks required to field much more than local forces.
By the time Western nations start to recover, mass columns of refugees from the world over start entering their undefended borders. In a few months all resources are drained and millions more die.
In the end anywhere connected by easily traversable land and sea connections is overrun and eventually decays into semi-nomadic tribes. The few sufficiently advanced civilisations to survive will be in places considered too cold or difficult to reach by hordes of desperate refugees - perhaps Switzerland, the Faroe Islands, northern Norway and Finland, Siberia, Iceland, Greenland, parts of Canada and Alaska.
Anonymous 65662
>>65560We need a containment board for femcel shit.
Anonymous 65684
>>65662If you don't like it, you can hide the thread. It's not that hard.
Anonymous 65687
>>65560Good, there are too many people anyway. We need a good soft reset.
Anonymous 65781
>>22723>things become stagnantNothing wrong with that. Progress is destroying us and all the other inhabitants of this planet.
Anonymous 65816
>>22721That wouldn't work. The "war to drastically reduce the male population" thing already happened in Russia, and it's fucked up female gender relations ever since. Women are forced to dress up like sluts in order to attract the few remaining viable men who aren't alchoholics
Anonymous 65876
>>65816That also happened in Paraguay 1864-70, basically 90% of men died and Paraguayan catholic church de facto legalized polygamy after war
Anonymous 66190
Kek fuck scrotes and handmaidens on this board.
Anonymous 66208
>>66190While it’s annoying, I think it’s proof that women are inherently better than men because we at least disagree whether our lives would improve if we kill/enslave all men. All moids, weak and strong, have a desire to brutalize women, only making exceptions for “the good ones” to essentially be their slaves.
To get back on topic, I think an all-female world would be more socialistic. UBI, subsidized childcare for single mothers (as everyone who chooses to have kids would be one), college and healthcare for all. Taxes would go up slightly, but not too much due to a reduction of defense and police force spending. Crime would go down, especially rape and child molestation, with prison reform following close behind due to a smaller pool of convicts to rehabilitate and a genuine interest to actually help the criminals. Other than that, it wouldn’t be too much different from many countries today. There would still be inequalities and conflict, but there would be much more quality-of-life improvements as society would be set up for us.
I imagine this scenario happening over time in the not too distant future. Men would slowly die out as women have access to genetically modified sperm to have children with no comparable equivalent to men. Men would have no desire to mate the typical way due to hyperrealistic VR porn and wanting to epically dunk on feminists by going MGTOW.
Once the order is established, I foresee males still being born in this new, female-dominated world, but they would be rare due to sex-linked genetic diseases and social stigmas around raising a son (less than 10% of the babies born). The ones who make it to adulthood likely would become either sperm producers in a lab or work in “adult entertainment” to produce a boyfriend experience for the straights. And yes, very wealthy women may have their own
sigh “raccoon moids” but they would be very expensive to purchase and it would considered somewhat eccentric to have one.
Anonymous 66387
exs me.jpg
>>66190Imagine thinking society wouldn't collapse if half its population suddenly disappeared
Anonymous 66478
>>66387What if it wasn't a overnight thing? Men slowly dying off over the years allowing women in the society to adapt.
Anonymous 66481
>>66478Depends on how the replacement dies. If more and more moid babies result in miscarriages, then you would see severe economic downturn and possible societal collapse as result, since a reduction in citizens destroys a democratic economy. If the moids, instead of just dying out as time goes by, but instead replaced with a higher number of female births it should be fine theoretically.
Anonymous 66540
>>66481Lower male to female ratios in society lead to a increases in violence, wouldn't be surprised if this in combination with less farmers, construction workers, and engineers is what collapsed society.
Anonymous 66543
>>66540I mean it would cause women to pick up farming, construction and engineering. Why do you assume women aren't in those field already? And with a decreasing male population there will just be more women in those fields.
Anonymous 66643
Women need twice as much protection from cops than moids and need to be believed twice as much more too.
Cops existence should be mainly to protect women first then moids second because we are more valuable naturally than moids who are significantly more disposable.
Anonymous 66707
>>66643I really hate to break it to you, sweetie, but modern (70's/80's) feminism has gotten us pretty close to true equality, this includes making us just as worthless as men. We aren't able to cash in on chivalry anymore, so we wageslave in dingy mcdonalds/ford factories just as hard as the men, we arent special anymore, we've rejected our intrinsic advantage of being pampered but dependent homemakers in favor of the independence to slave right next so our beloved (and reviled) male counterpart in true equality. Instead of lobbying to smash the patriarchy the radfems on here should lobby for destroying fatcat capitalism. (And stop blaming men for being shutin incels just like the MGTOW scum), then again most of the radfems on here are just tranny moids, so
shrug Anonymous 66710
>>66707Triggered handmaiden detected.
Anonymous 66790
>>66755>anyone who has a single nice thing to say about men IS a manGo outside.
Anonymous 66792
>>66790if you're really a woman, lemme tell you men will never reciprocate the sympathy and devotion you have to them, they don't even see you as human
hope you get picked tho
Anonymous 66793
>>66707I'd rather work in a gas station and live in a shitty apartment than to spend a single day being a cheating moids slave
Also isn't it convenient how when succeed past men on the average nowadays to the point where men literally think they're oppressed for flunking out of high school?
Anonymous 66794
>>66707Also housewives were far from pampered, most of them were depressed, suicidal, and abused. Only pickmes and moids who don't do research before they speak think being a 50s housewife is some luxurious thing evil feminists destroyed
Anonymous 66796
>>66792Go outside, incel
>>66793You too, and learn to TEAR APART a man's brain before you let him anywhere near your naked body
>>66794>what i was told by media portraying a past through it's modern feminist lens is exactly what happenedI mean, im sure there was a problem, there's still one noe, but i'm also sure that you watched American horror story and took 30% of your bias from their asylum season (or equivilent media)
Also of note, as was mentioned here before, the more egalitarian the society becomes, the more of us opt to stay home anyways.
God i hate the fucking pinkpillers here, they're just as bad as those militant incel moids, purely a genderswap
Anonymous 66797
>>66707If you really understood radfem theory you'd know that patriarchy preceeded capitalism, coming later only to reinforce women's oppression that already existed. Thus, destroying patriarchy foremostly is reorienting the whole system and weakening capital relations.
Socialist regimes hated women just the same, because they had men in charge, and they enable patriarchy in whatever shit they do. You know that, right?
Patriarchy is the most pervasive, longest slavery system in our entire history and it reflects on every other social, economic, political dynamic we've ever had.
Anonymous 66798
>>66796This is ridiculous. Stop trolling and find something else to do.
Anonymous 66952
>Western women are also bullied and harassed out of STEM.
In my experience, this is a meme pushed by people with arts degrees.
t. Biomedical engineering student.
Anonymous 66957
>>66952>Biomedical engineering studentuse you magic words to grow us bfs
Anonymous 66978
Not >>66947 but I wanted to add the example of the kibbutz, where they raised kids as gender neutral as possible and mostly separated from parental influence.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/350481?seq=1https://jwa.org/encyclopedia/article/kibbutzAnonymous 66982
>>66952>I haven't experienced therefore it doesn't happenSure, because computer dudes are totally able to be around women and act stable about it
Anonymous 66983
>>66952I don't know such cases personally but I remember reading posts on lolcow written by two women who resigned from STEM for this reason. Am I supposed to think they were lying? They seemed pretty informed. Just because you haven't seen it personally doesn't mean it doesn't happen
Anonymous 66985
>>66952This.
I've never really run into any harassment to myself or others purely for being women. Of course it exists, but there's a difference between isolated incidents and a systemic issue. I can't really put faith in this everlooming boogeyman that wants to rape my guts out at anytime if I never see any of the effects it has.
Anonymous 66989
>>66985It still exists whether or not you’ve paid any attention to it. Many women can speak upon it.
Anonymous 66990
Honestly it would be sustainable as long as we keep the sperm banks. Women can live with each other and when new women need to be born just use the dead moids sperm. Abort all males before they are born. Men have literally out lived their own purpose on this planet and we could survive without them
Anonymous 66992
>>66990Based. I wish it was possible but handmaidens will never let it happen
Anonymous 66996
>>66992get rid of the handmaidens first then
Anonymous 67000
>>66990You saw it here. Women saying that if men disappeared they'd kill themselves. They would gladly off themselves and die with their own enemies and terrorizers. Lmao
It'll never happen, unfortunately. Even if there was a purge that wiped males or something, women would do anything to spare them, or ever sacrifice their own lives to their moids.
It's depressing.
Anonymous 67002
I hate most moids, but they are necessary for certain laborious shitjobs that i don't think women would do without being straight up forced
Anonymous 67008
>>67002Depends, I see more and more women participating in labor work, especially construction and factory work, one of my closest friends is a welder, on top of that we are most definitely seeing growth of women becoming EMTs, firefighters, police and other sorts of public service. Obviously it's not like we are just gonna wake up tomorrow and all physical labor fields are going to be dominated by women by denying the growth that's happening is just false
One of the funniest things about moids is the fact that they can't comprehend why women would be willing to go work in factories or be a truck driver to support themselves rather than be their personal house and sex slaves, they are literally that narcissistic
Anonymous 67009
>>67002Just because women in your circles don't work in male-dominated spaces, doesn't mean there aren't women out there that do. I studied computer science so I know hundreds of female computer scientists, engineers, physicists, mathematicians, biologists etc etc etc because we hung around in the same circles.
Anonymous 67013
>>67009>computer science, engineers, biologistsUm how are they laborious? I'm talking about coal mining, warehouse jobs, construction work etc
Anonymous 67016
China-female-migra…
>>67013Damn anona, you really living with your head on the sand
Women aren't as weak as we tend to think. When there's need, women do the job. We might need more arms to counterbalance the labourious jobs, yes, but we would do it just fine given the need.
Anonymous 67017
>>67013If we switched to solar power the need for coal would be very little, not to mention most coal mines call for people to live in specific places, most of which are religious rural areas where women are encouraged to stay home or do caregiving work. Also anyone's who's worked in a warehouse know many women work in there, in fact I helped run a job fair for a huge chain warehouse in my area and about half or maybe more than half of the people who went are female, there are bias against different gendered warehouse workers though. As for construction a lot of women are getting into construction. Obviously it's not half and half before anyone claims I'm saying labor fields are half and half but it's getting more equal by the minute
https://www.nawic.org/nawic/Statistics.aspNot to mention the pay gap, women make less for doing the same exact job when they are in construction
>In b4 moids or handmaidens start screeching at the meer word pay gap without even reading the article Anonymous 67022
>>67013Yeah, I know. Sorry I don't have many builder or coal miner friends but I didn't want to speak for a field I'm not involved in. But if women can work in fields where they've been told they don't have the mental capacity to, I'm sure we'll manage to figure out how to operate heavy machinery and women who aren't traditionally "feminine" will step up to the plate. I'm sure they'd love to work in these fields but aren't taken seriously at the moment.
It wasn't too long ago we believed women couldn't drive cars or ride in a train either.
Anonymous 67034
>>67022True, the only issue is the fact that if women want to work in these fields in order to even be considered for a job at most of these places they expect big burly dykes, they expect women to drop their femininity and attractiveness in these fields. Men aren't needed for physical labor no more especially since so many machines and various intentions have been made to reduce effort needed, not to mention most men who take up these fields are only in it for money, not that there's anything wrong with that but women do get paid less in these fields so why would women take up physical labor jobs when they're paid less and the only reason why most people are in the field is money? No one wakes up one day and claims that they want to pipefit or move things around on a forklift in a freezer, it's supposed to be a transition job that you use for money now but men will sit down and box up chocolate all day and act like they're doing the entire world a favor and everyone should bow down to them, I've never seen a woman act like a mediocre job is changing the world, meanwhile men could be bussers at olive garden and act like they're high and mighty
Anonymous 67036
It's kind of fun to think about but in all seriousness I think it would be miserable. Classism isn't going to just disappear, and pretty soon the true loyalties of supposedly woke rich women would become obvious and spoilers, it isn't to their 'sisters'
Anonymous 67145
>>66983They don't have to have been lying for their experiences to have been extremely unusual.
Anonymous 67150
>>6714590% of lolcow stories are fake
Anonymous 67179
>>67176I’ll summarize the thread for you without looking:
>look at this crazy idea wahman on this femcel forum have>haha silly wahman they can’t govern anything and are too [blank] to govern anything besides muh dick>some women hatefuel screenshot >NOOOOO my trad based internet waifu would NEVER think this. We can redpill them, I promise!>stfu simpAnd the thread goes on like this until it dies
Basically, women can’t exist without men commenting on it lmao. Desperate much?
Anonymous 67180
>>67179It's quite literally the greatest paradox of the manosphere's existence. MGTOW, despite being named after "going your own way," is more or less dedicated to incessantly whinging about women. Sure, sometimes they post a picture of their gym or whatever, but for the most part, it's just talking about how much they hate women. The same goes for TRP, MRA, whatever it's called. And, of course, these groups inherently attract the more virulent misogynist types because those losers see what's already going on and know they get to use them as outlets for their hate.
But the biggest lie they tell themselves on a daily basis is that we need them to survive. That a woman who doesn't end up marrying a man becomes miserable and kills herself because she hit the wall and can't find anyone anymore. That there are so many more men who can't get into relationships because they've "given up on women," lmao. Male delusion and narcissism is a hell of a drug.
Anonymous 67183
>>22752I think its pretty simple.
Those women don't have any good men in their lives. =(
Good men can make life feel safe and exciting at the same time.
A terrible moid turns it into living hell.
Anonymous 67184
>>22754Women aren't exactly lining up to be construction/sanitation workers. Moids can go play in shit, I'd rather not personally.
You really don't think things like highways/sewers/garbage collection wouldn't take a hit?
Anonymous 67191
>>67184And why exactly aren’t they taking those jobs?
Anonymous 67194
>>67191Because those jobs are objectively terrible?
Sweaty, smelly and no-one has the slightest bit of respect for you?
Anonymous 67197
Yeah but its clearly not several thousand in services.
You can make him iron his own shit too. And if he can't dress himself moderately, don't get involved with him.
Anonymous 67199
>>67197It’s unpaid labor still.
And try saying him to do his own shit. Try it
Anonymous 67201
>>67199>>67197But that's the thing, as a housewife men are getting all these luxuries for almost free. It's the man's job to prove why it would be better for a woman to cook, clean, raise kids and to live with him, rather than just get a job doing something similar and halfing her own work while being able to live in peace and not have to clean up after an adult man. This especially applies if a man is out expecting the cooking skills of master chef, the sex skills of a porn star, the cleaning skills of a Ritz Carlton housekeeper. If you're a mechanic at walmart or warehouse workers, unless you're making serious bank you have to prove why women should give you insane amounts of free labor, whether it be her own allowance or the fact in order to keep decent women around you have to be decent yourself
Anonymous 67202
>>67201>This especially applies if a man is out expecting the cooking skills of master chef, the sex skills of a porn star, the cleaning skills of a Ritz Carlton housekeeper.I've found most men don't expect those things in all honesty. Especially the house keeper part considering they're all slobs. Doing a reasonable job cooking and a shitty job housekeeping is enough.
Then you have to find one thats not porn sick though.
And yeah the rest of what you said is a big problem these days. Why I said you need a reasonable moid. They seem to be much more rare these days tho.
If you can't find one you're completely right about the career instead.
Anonymous 67204
>>67202>Why I said you need a reasonable moid. They seem to be much more rare these days thoI mean, back in the day women just assumed the housewife position so moids didn't have anything to be butthurt about. Now they're unhappy because of feminism. It's not that suddenly men got more fucked up, they've always been like this, but women were always giving them what they wanted. Men who were ok with splitting housework were always rare.
Anonymous 67212
the world would be almost exactly the same because most people are mentally retarded no matter their sex or gender
it's a hopeless world out there
Anonymous 67244
>>67179I just checked to see if you were right and there were like 5 posts in the whole thread, all of which were very boring. They were all:
>the would go extinct>there'd be less rape but more doxxing because women are catty or something>society would collapseI have no idea why the other anon even linked it. It wasn't worth the time it took to read it. Even this post about it isn't worth reading. I've actually stolen precious seconds of your life from you.
Anonymous 71865
Забавные-котики.jp…
much less violence, especially physical violence, global removal of nuclear/mass-destruction weapons since no one wants to "have a bigger gun than this guy"
crime rates drop dramatically, especially rape/sexual abuse which causes mental disorders such as (c)PTSD and BPD be much less prevalent in the population
eating disorders are just a form of self-harm and not about body dysmorphia anymore because there won't be any moids to compete for, no moids to enforce painful/uncomfortable beauty standards for women
Anonymous 233736
>How would things be like?
>Do you think the world would be less violent? Less capitalist? Are any things you think that would be worse? What would be better?
There wouldn't any be raids or cp being posted. Which is something I keep having the misfortune of seeing on female orientated imageboards. Scrotes are so vile and the ones who post/make cp should be be wiped out.
Anonymous 233759
>>22836>Men are actually more empathetic than women in terms of morals and ideals>Women are pretty vicious and don't really care either way.More violent crimes are committed by men than women. Idk how this is was not flagged as a scrote post
Anonymous 233761
>>22715Supreme. Better media that's for sure.
Anonymous 233763
>>233761Then again I think we should keepsome males and just make then nonviolent cute drones
Anonymous 233962
It's already possible to reproduce without any male sperm btw. Google 'reciprocal IVF'
Anonymous 233968
Probably cultural stagnation and gradual dismantling of group identity. Without men enforcing borders, religion and tribal identities with violence and war. We'd probably see a society similar to today's consumer culture. The main positive is less violent crime but more atomized depressed individuals without purpose. Open borders and everyone becoming a slave to media and commercial products. While abandoning labels like race, religion and nationality.
Anonymous 233977
>>233968Nationalism is a retarded male meme anyway.
Anonymous 233980
>>233968>Open borders and everyone becoming a slave to media and commercial productsI'll take my material possessions over racist moids any day.
Anonymous 233982
We'd probably a lower birthrate with smaller countries. Maybe even have entire segments of the planet be uninhabited by humans. Australia, Alaska and most of America probably wouldn't even exist. Since it was a byproduct of western expansion by men and industry tycoons.
Anonymous 233996
>>233985
Video is staged sexist garbage. Moid spam do not respond.
So then why are all working women and single mothers not all starving and "failing to survive" ? Why don't schools run by mostly women turn into failed institutions shut down by chaos and bickering etc ? The video is incel garbage
Anonymous 234001
>>22739
>I want to enjoy this and wouldn't stop if given the opportunity but nobody should be able to have it, even if they want to, because I don't want them to People are genuinely scary
Anonymous 234009
>>22737Maybe not held down but learned to be self aware as women are because they're forced to be. Period. Men who would call this slavery are whiny. Period :l
We should definitely instill the fear of God in shitty Men. Maybe not enslave them or kill them off but make them them genuinely afraid to be the filthy entitled shits they can become. :)
Anonymous 234011
>>233982You realize North America, Alaska, and Australia have been inhabited by humans since primitive age, right? They'd still exist and have civilization. In fact there'd be vast civilization in North America. Obviously it wouldn't be one unified country, but without colonial expansion the native population wouldn't be wiped out and their cities would still remain
Anonymous 234013
green.jpg
>>22715What will happen to our yaoi in a world without men?
Anonymous 234016
boston-dynamics-do…
>>22737Everything is becoming automated and hard labor is becoming less necessary. Eventually men will become unemployed while women dominate the tech field. These modern day luddites will be sent to the salt mines and potato fields. While women and robots take over the world.
Anonymous 234021
>>234015someone try and explain the appeal of yaoi to me
Anonymous 234022
>>234021Most heterosexual romance in fiction is aimed at a coomer male audience. With the women being depicted as overly sexualized or as a negative stereotype. While yaoi removes the negative depiction of women altogether to focus of male romance.
Anonymous 234024
>>234021I tried and failed to think of an explanation I honestly think that being a fujo just runs in the blood. If the mere sight of two beautiful men locking eyes doesn't spark something in your heart then you simply don't have it in you and no lengthy explanation can really make you understand the appeal.
Anonymous 234032
>>234021for a straight/bi woman: same as the appeal of lesbian porn/yuri to straight/bi moids.
one naked sexy man = good
two naked sexy men = even better
simple as
(don’t know about the appeal of yaoi to lesbians though)
Anonymous 234037
>>234021overwhelming majority of yaoi is made by women for women so you're more likely to get good stuff there
Anonymous 234529
>>66707>we've rejected our intrinsic advantage of being pampered but dependent homemakersThis was only ever true if you were uber rich/nobility and only true for upper middle class after the industrial revolution was well under way.
For 99% recorded history, the VAST majority of people were slumming it down on the farm working from sun-up to sun-down. Even the kids and the old folks (if they miraculously survived into old age).
Anonymous 234530
>>67017>If we switched to solar power the need for coal would be very littlelol
LMAO even
Anonymous 234531
>>66707stop basing your knowledge of history on tv shows and romance. most people were working hard, men and women alike.
>homemakersthe baby was left with the older siblings or some frail grandma. guess what the mother was doing? SHE WAS FUCKING WORKING.
also the housewife shit is a rich people thing.
you're a fucking moron.
