[ Rules / FAQ ] [ meta / b / media / img / feels / hb / x ]

/b/ - Random

Name
Email
Message

*Text* => Text

**Text** => Text

***Text*** => Text

[spoiler]Text[/spoiler] => Text

Image
Direct Link
Options NSFW image
Sage (thread won't be bumped)
Check the Catalog before making a new thread.
Do not respond to maleposters. See Rule 7.
Please read the rules! Last update: 04/27/2021

unknown.png

AI is going to be the worst development of our lifetime Anonymous 255309

I know it's the tranniest opinion in the world at the moment to be against AI art but it really does just fucking suck.
It sucks knowing that creativity is only going to be further sucked out of the web by this bullshit.
It sucks that LLM explanations are going to replace searches.
It sucks that intrusive catering is going to replace actually browsing the web
Social media was already bad enough with trying to keep you hooked, never letting you explore and algorithmic manipulation so potent it started effecting people's real life behaviors. Now with all this AI nonsense, it's only going to worsen all of the worst aspects of social media. Everything will be further dissocialized, and based on predictability and patterns.
When people argue about automoation, it's always political discussions of how it's "destroying the economy" or "making all our lives easier" when the ONLY thing it's actually doing is removing the social aspect of so many parts of our lives. How the fuck are people just so blind to this?

Anonymous 255311

Plus so many retards genuinely can’t distinguish ai from real photos

Anonymous 255312

I say smartphones are worse

Anonymous 255313

YES and many stupid people still support that. It kills creativity, artists and people are just becoming more dumb by using it for work

Anonymous 255314

tsmt

Anonymous 255335

There is nothing wrong with AI art.
>nooo not my heckin furry porn commissioninos!!!

Anonymous 255341

>>255335
I have not voluntarily looked at porn of any sort, be it AI generated or real since like 2014. Nice projection you retard.

Anonymous 255342

>>255335
Yeah this is an unpopular opinion with artists who like to manually draw this subject matter but I like AI art of commercial pretty things like portraits of anime girls and animals just standing around smiling and looking pretty. There are always some weird parts like funky looking eyes but the mistakes can be fixed manually with some human effort.

Anonymous 255351

>>255342
Are you even an artist? You do realise that AI art is using basically artist’s styles illegally? + it looks so lifeless and same all the time, not to mention the crappy generating lmao

Anonymous 255357

>>255342
It's also just a bad opinion.
Yeah sure some of the pictures can be pretty. So were the ones it needed to steal data from in order to exist at all. The fact that the h

Anonymous 255358

>>255357
*human element is gone is bad for countless reasons, but the main one being that it means algorithms are just taking everything over even more.

Anonymous 255363

>>255309
I mean, it's not like artists aren't gonna AI use to refine their artwork or use it as templates or maybe fix it. I remember people saying the whole soulless spiel about Photoshop and other digital image software in the past. I know for fact furries are using AI to finetube their garbage since they care about detail

Anonymous 255365

>>255363
Photoshop is a tool you use on your own bare metal machine you have at home.
AI is something you have no control over.
I really don't care what furries are doing.

Anonymous 255369

>>255367
of course scrotes do.

Anonymous 255376

EFLthgOXkAAvcH8.pn…

>>255341
The most vocal haters of AI art are porn "artists" and people who do corpo graphic design like picrel for a living, because those things are the most trivial to mass-produce with AI. To both I say good-riddance.
Human art isn't going to disappear. AI will just be another tool at the disposal of future artists. Stop being a seething twitteroid luddite.

>>255365
You can absolutely run something like Stable Diffusion on your own machine, provided you have beefy hardware.

Anonymous 255380

dragon wizard.png

>>255309
I do think it should be limited, not just for art but for most things as a matter of common sense. I do admit, some of the AI memes have been pretty funny, and a lot of artists are insufferable, but I enjoy art and memes that have soul. Even with the hands and other "tells" that AI art has getting better,I can just sense when art is AI. It doesn't have the same tangible feeling that hand made art does.

Anonymous 255384

>>255376
>The most vocal haters of AI art are porn "artists" and people who do corpo graphic design like picrel for a living,
Ok, great. I'm not.
>Human art isn't going to disappear.
From many spaces on the internet, yes it is. When YouTube #shorts rolled out, it immediately became majority bots. at this point that majority leaves human made garbage to a single digit percent. That's the future of everywhere online.
>AI will just be another tool at the disposal of future artists.
To do what with? Only sort of generate art and let them fill in the blanks? who gives a fuck about people who do that when it can do the entire job itself, even if poorly, way faster.
>Stop being a seething twitteroid luddite.
You're a fucking bootlicker, not some technophile
Also SD legitimately sucks unless it's running on a whole server farm and even then it's lightyears behind DALL-E 3

I love that AI art is the only thing the pro-AI retards can actually defend about it too. Defend with a straight face all the ways it's being used to dissocialize our society and flood people with inescapable propaganda. You'll be outing yourself as somebody with literally no social life.

Anonymous 255385

>>255380
>I do think it should be limited, not just for art but for most things as a matter of common sense
It's not a problem of it being "too powerful". The drawbacks of it are intentional, not some unfortunate symptom
I enjoy some of the memes I've seen people make with it too, but a future where that's all memes, is not a good one.

Anonymous 255386

>>255385
Not all the drawbacks are intentional. Generative AI's use in pornographic imagery and interactive erotica, for example, is specifically treated with extreme hostility by the established powers building and promoting AI. To the point where characters.ai's users have spent a year or more doing almost nothing but complain about how their chatbot personalities are now unusable for anything except, ironically, extremely fetishistic and often violent non-genital erotica.

Anonymous 255388

>>255386
Well yeah, that's a very niche issue though.
I don't doubt there's things that the developers don't want people doing with their data miner bots


[Return] [Catalog]
[ Rules / FAQ ] [ meta / b / media / img / feels / hb / x ]