/b/ - Random

>>266851
nobody cares

>>266853
It’s kinda interesting. When the media starts pushing the femcel narrative big time and every zoomer with an internet connection starts using femcel as the buzzword of the week at least you know where it started

I’m interested in reading the full text. I’m just happy they got femcels>incels right.

What if they made a femcel AI chatbot from our posts

Femcels are just regular women voicing our frustrations with the patriarchy. We aren't incels

>>267031
it'd be more accurate to label it "fgtow" than femcel cause femcels would be female involuntary celibates (while lacking an incel's impotent rage). Especially since the worst one could say is the women here are "misandric" and separatist. Not girls pining for men while hate criming them (or wishing they could)

>>266851
cc is not a femcel board tho

>>267029
Hopefully some normies will get a hold of it and find out we’re actually correct (I’m not a femcel btw, but I could see how men and pickmes could call me that)

>Sorry, sci-hub has not included this article yet
hook us up, OP
also post your rare sci-hub memes

>>267052
scihub hasn't been good for years. it's only good for old papers