>>296961Some realistic thoughts:
1. This will probably advantage women more than men. Let's be honest: pregnancy does interrupt women's careers. Women won't have to take breaks from work and can have kids later in life like men do. The main advantage men have over us will vanish and I fully expect women to end up earning more than men in the end.
2. Incels claim they're going to use this technology but realistically: will they? Do they seriously want kids? Why aren't they adopting or getting a surrogate mother now if that's the case? The fact that single fathers are waaaaay less common than single mothers should tell you how this will go.
3. Men being in controll doesn't mean very much IMHO. The person who creates the technology isn't nearly as important as the person who uses is.
4. Moidstinction is the best case scenario. If you explained the effects of a Y chromosome (vastly more likely to become a violent criminal, emotionally stunted etc) nobody would let their kid have that shit. It's 100% possible to have 2 female parents, no men involved.
It's unlikely they'll stop being produced, but 80% of people would rather adopt a girl, most in vitro kids are chosen to be girls, the preference towards daughters. It's entirely possible for moids to quickly become a minority, eventually a small minority.