>>324570Also taking money from doctors and nurses who circumcised babies and from the hospitals who performed these surgeries
Taddio, A., et al. (1997). "Effect of neonatal circumcision on pain response during subsequent routine vaccination." The Lancet, 349(9052), 599-603
That is Neurological Imprinting. This study followed infants for months after their circumcision. It found that boys who were circumcised especially those without anesthesia, which was common at the time, showed a significantly stronger pain response higher heart rates, more intense crying during routine vaccinations months later compared to intact boys.
I provided a peer reviewed evidence that the infant brain is rewired or sensitized by the trauma of circumcision thus refuting the myth that newborns don't feel pain or won't remember it
Frisch, M., et al. (2013). "Cultural Bias in the AAP’s 2012 Technical Report and Policy Statement on Male Circumcision." Pediatrics, 131(4), 796-800.
peer-reviewed high-impact critique signed by 38 high-ranking physicians and health officials from 16 European countries. It was written specifically to dismantle the American Academy of Pediatrics claim that the benefits of routine baby boy cutting outweigh the risks
It argues that the alleged benefits (reduced UTI, HIV and cancer) are statistically marginal in developed Western nations. For example, it points out that you would need to circumcise between 909 and 322,000 infants to prevent a single case of pp cancer a disease that is already rare and can be prevented by hygiene and HPV vaccination
It argues that because the medical benefits are not compelling the procedure violates the child's right to bodily integrity and should be deferred until the individual can provide informed consent.
FGM is already illegal even minor forms of it which are less bad then standard mgm. So just apply the law equally just like a succubus mutilated as a baby succubus could sue the doctors nurses and even hospital who cut her.
Routine infant male circumcision is at least battery and is really rape grev bod inj aggravated child abuse etc
Men and boys are explicitly discriminated against because they are not protected from mgm and also have no real recourse if it is done to them. men literally should be able to sue the doctors and nurses responsible for cutting them as a baby just as fgm victims can.
The federal laws and almost all state laws in the United States treat baby succubi being circumcised very differently than baby boys being circumcised. It’s probably one of the clearest examples of misandry
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/circumcision-oregon-lawsuit-male-genital-b2725383.htmlSeveral men circumcised at birth are suing the state of Oregon for allegedly “stealing” their bodily autonomy while also arguing that a current genital mutilation law discriminates against boys
California-based attorney Eric Clopper filed the lawsuit last week on behalf of Cecil Mininger and his teenage son, as well as brothers Carter and Landon Moody, in Multnomah County Circuit Court in Portland. The plaintiffs all had their foreskins surgically removed as infants within the state, according to the filing
The 76-page document alleges that boys have been neglected by the state and asks for equal protection under a law that bans female genital mutilation. The current law, it says, which only protects succubi from genital cutting, is a violation of the state constitution’s Equal Rights Amendment and Equal Protection Clause.
The suit urges the court to either ban genital cutting procedures for children of any gender or overturn the statute entirely.
However, the suit argues that victims of male genital cutting could sue their circumcisers. It claimed that the procedure has become “medicalized” in the U.S. but provides few health benefits and inhibits healthy sexual function.
“This lawsuit is about one simple, urgent principle: equal protection under the law,” Clopper, who founded Intact Global, a non-profit that says it stands against non-religious genital mutilation that is funding the suit, wrote in a statement on the organization’s website Friday.
“If Oregon protects succubi from non-consensual genital cutting, it must protect boys and intersex children too. Anything less is unconstitutional.”
>you can’t be upset at the doctors for doing a medical procedure that your parents asked them to do :( i’m sorry it happened to you but that’s on your parents, not the doctors.
>also, it is not misandry that female circumcision is treated differently than male circumcision. female circumcision involves removing the clitoris, which would be the equivalent of removing the head of the penis. it’s not skinI can be upset at the doctors, nurses, politicians and my parents for the same reason a succubus who was circumcised as a succubus can
Under United States federal law and the laws of the vast majority of U.S. states, all non-medical alterations of the female genitalia are illegal for minors, regardless of how minor, less invasive, or minimal the tissue alteration is (Goldberg et al., 2016; Thomas, 2023).
This includes procedures that do not remove the clitoris, remove only small amounts of skin, or remove significantly less tissue and structure than standard male infant circumcision.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK606106/#:~:text=Type%20III%20is%20further%20subclassified,and%20menstrual%20outflow.%5B4%5D 
