Anonymous 325756
Why not make castration mandatory for adolescent moids who commit sexual harassment and/or have signs that they will (IE hypersexuality, family history)
>Less sexual harassment in general>Lower recidivismdoi.org/10.1080/19585969.2024.2359923
>Eugenics; rapists aren't allowed to breed>The first dozen verse of Matthew ch.19 supports it anyway, especially the twelfth (ESV)This is already what some countries do, including the czech republic, which itself has a big harassment issue (their Easter traditions for instance).
https://www.thehastingscenter.org/is-castration-of-sex-offenders-ever-ethically-justified/The difference here is that sexual harassment can be practically eradicated altogether if enough people agree on it.
Anonymous 325760
Preaching to the choir, anon.
Anonymous 325761
people care too much about the rights and dignity of male offenders, that's why. the article you included says
>The surgery is irreversible, disfiguring, and can cause feelings of humiliation and a lack of dignity. These harms arguably make it cruel and unusual punishment.
you know what's humiliating and un-dignifying? sexual abuse & harassment. cruel? objectification & degradation through a provocative/sexual context. but the mere THOUGHT that male offenders would be punished duly for it is what gets people squirming. the world truly isn't ready to care about women enough, not at all
but from a different perspective, breeding is integral to a lot of people's inherent sense of purpose, so permanently removing someone's ability to have children; even consensually, forever; is too far when the alternative chemical castration exists. if having kids wasn't so precious to people, even going so far as to let severely disabled people reproduce and torture their children with a painful existence, then we'd maybe have a shot.
