>>33965>My model of sex/gender suggests that if something is appealing for X reason to a member of one sex/gender, then X reason likely constitutes part of the appeal of the thing to the other sex/gender.
Why would this premise ever strike you as sound? By this logic children are appealing to everyone because we're all coomer pedophiles. We know that not to be the case, because while men like children because they're coomer pedophiles, women like children because of maternalistic instincts or because they think they're cute/funny/interesting etc.
Relationships in general serve as a counterexample to this premise. Men like relationships because it allows them to increase their social status - women like relationships because of companionship.
> This would hypothetically make her more appealing to INTP males as a "rare breed" of waifu or whatever while having the same effect on INTP females in terms of providing a rare fictional self-analog.
While I think it's true that INTP women tend to prefer INTP men I don't think you can assume the same holds true the other way around. Most men are threatened by women more intelligent than them, but since Ti is the dominant trait of INTPs that probably holds even more true for them. They tend to cling to their own perception of how the world works, so dating a woman who does the same (another INTP) would likely frustrate or threaten them.
I think most men wouldn't really like an INTP woman because they tend not to engage in over practices of femininity and so don't serve as appealing sexual prospects - since men objectify women, they don't really see value in anything other
than their capacity to serve as a sexual prospect. I think CC serves as a testament to this - I think CC consists of a mix of INTP femcels and maybe xNFP women with BPD.