/meta/ - Board Discussion

>>4838
I've never understood why mods don't hand out warnings and instead, jump straight to the banhammer. Something this miniscule seems like it'd get a warning instead of an out right ban.
Is it just not possible to administer warnings yet?

presumably the thread where we post like moids?

>>4842
mods might be larping moids. I posted a rather mild comment condemning the men in a thread about a video of men being violent and it was deleted for no reason at all. meanwhile moids post 100x horrendous thing about women on their boards and get celebrated and encouraged for it. they can't lose I guess.

>>4844
You think? This place is infested with moids or very sad sad women
>Constant boob obsession, shaming other women into oblivion, constantly making everything about what men like and freaking out at anons who point out humans aren't a hivemind
>Pedo excusing anons
>Constant male centered threads
>That bizarre thread about how goth girls are all pure and easy to manipulate???

At this point we've turn into a weird bimbofication forum with added pedophilia and trying to normalize the idea that's it's completely normal and natural for men to want to abuse women

>>4845
The goth girl thread was actually against the rules, it was a thinly veiled "Why do men like…" thread which is de factor against the rules. It's already been removed.

>>4845
Completely. I know people joke that this place is infested with moids and troons but it's not a joke at this point. Men get defended for the most horrific and atrocious behavior here. And I never thought I'd see the day that women would openly defend pedophles and abusers. Just sickening.

>>4847
Yeah I think defending pedophilia/rape, excusing male behavior as "eh it's natural theres nothing you can do about it :) I'm not a moid ;)" and vigorously defending men should be against the rules, as it's a clear identifier of a moid

>>4838
Since you’re obviously posting this screenshot here, does this mean that you’re ban evading?

>>4852
I didn't know trying to convince women abuse and pedophilia was normal as well as body shaming features that are out of women's control was just an opinion

>>4845
They're trannies most likely

>>4853
You seem like you're reframing everything as pedophilia, kind of weird.

>>4855
One of the problems we were having here is moids/troons/pickmes/whatever trying to normalize or excuse pedophilia. First you wanted to claim that "it was just an opinion" and then you claimed I rebranded everything as pedophilia. Do you even know what you're talking about? What planet do you live on where calling out pedo problems within a community is "rebranding everything as pedophilia" ???

>>4853
everything's just an opinion when it comes down to it.

>>4860
Most useless post on this website

10+ replies and no one gave OP a proper answer. Keep going autists, I love you. PP general is the pinkpill thread, by the way. I'm happy to see mods are starting to crack down on this, cause the scrote-related posts all over the website are starting to become annoying.

>>4863
>10+ replies and no one gave OP a proper answer.
Oh wow, it's almost like not even other anons could parse out what the fuck mods were trying to say. It's a bullshit ban reason anyway.

>>4849
yeah, and it spirals out of control.

maybe the actual real option is to ignore whatever poster seems creepy which I have trouble doing n I'm guilty about it. T_T

>>4864
It's not, we've been asking for containment threads to be enforced over and over again for months now. Some people don't wanna get the memo, so they get banned. That's what bans are for. It's fine, it's not shameful or embarrassing to be banned. You'll be back.

>>4849
I kind of think the mods should make a rule against stuff like defending pedophilia, rape, etc. It's always pedantic and dumb and goes nowhere and as you say, it really is a huge moid indicator.

In turn, I feel like there'd be less dumb arguments over it.

>>4838
I didn’t get a reason for my bad :(

>>4868
Refer to this post >>4842 at most these things deserve a warning.