/nsfw/ - xxx

>>7757
What do you enjoy about it
is it noncon you fantasize about specifically, is it a must, or just maledom

>>7777
wew QUADS

>>7768
>what. why would that be an evolutionary instinct?
NTA and I don't agree but I guess because reproduction rates would be higher?

Anyways to that poster who was deleted (I read but didn't have the energy to reply at the time), thanks for the retarded rant but I know rape fantasies are normal and incredibly common, my concern is the age of onset which was very young and also the hypersexual tendencies I discussed, you fucking retard.
>>7776
I'm assuming noncon stands for non-consensual, its that and maledom and I dunno

>>7780
>and I don't agree but I guess because reproduction rates would be higher?
and how would having other females raped by the same male benefit you exactly?

>>7781
>and how would having other females raped by the same male benefit you exactly?
I have no idea the thought process behind this, I'm taking a guess.
It doesn't benefit you as an individual but humanity as a whole. More rape means more sex, more sex means more babies, more babies means humanity shall prosper.
Idk I have no urge to watch other women get raped, thinking of others getting raped is kind of upsetting, I just want to be raped LMAO

>>7780
>my concern is the age of onset which was very young and also the hypersexual tendencies I discussed,

is that a weird thing? I don't understand why you have rape fantasies since I can't relate, but I started thinking about lewd stuff at a very young age, before I got my period even (7-8)

I don't think masturbating lots is weird either, seems most people fall into that when they are idle and not occupied by a hobby

I only started masturbating at a later age because I didn't know how to cum, if I knew I could rub my clit to cum I would have probably started at the same age as you
what are you concerned about? because I'd be surprised if majority of people didn't start having lewd thoughts that young

I started having lewd thoughts because I got exposed to sonic porn on google images by doing an innocent search "sonic and tails friends". I was around 8 years old. I don't think i even had those lewd thoughts sexually, it was more because of curiosity. I do think this might have fucked me up in some ways, I don't see how having lewd thoughts as a kid is normal. Especially since you can only have them if you are exposed to sexuality in some way or another. And we know that children should not be exposed to sexuality because it fucks them up.

>>7784

evolution doesn't work that way. every individual has an instinct to pass on their own genes and nothing more, there is no concept of "benefitting humanity" on an instinctual level

>>7791
>Especially since you can only have them if you are exposed to sexuality in some way or another

I wasn't even exposed to porn or anything lewd when I started having "naughty" thoughts as a kid, just like OP. Stuff like casual nudity and making out wasn't suited for TV where I grew up.
The most lewd thing which may have "corrupted" me is kiss scenes on dramas which weren't even that common. Kids obviously should not be exposed to explicit content or anything lewd, but obviously some people start having "funny feelings" earlier. If anything the fact that I wasn't exposed to porn (or even taught how babies are made, except that making babies is "naughty") only proves that sexuality manifests at a young age. It's creepy but I don't think it's rare. Though unlike OP my fantasizing only went as far as "I wanna kiss lots > get married > do the babymaking thing (whatever it is) > have baby like a good adult"
maybe what you need to start thinking "lewd" things as a kid isn't exposure to sex but rather being taught taboos. I distinctly remember being excited (at the same time embarrassed) about adults kissing on TV, but also, in my environment that kind of contact was super taboo!! super inappropriate!!!

>>7784
Do you really want to be raped as in brutalized or "cute moid forces me to have sex with him and in the end I enjoy it" kind of way?
>>7791
Lol, same, except I was 10 years old and it was my little pony
>>7793
I mean it really depends what you consider to be "too young". Exposed by adults? Anything below 16 would be disturbing. Willingly seek out sexual stuff? It varies from person to person, really.

>>7757
I'm a very similar case.
I remember watching a news report of a girl who was raped when I was around six, and combined with telenovelas, it made me think that rape and abuse were signs of love.
For the longest time, I was depressed that nobody would molest me because it made me think I wasn't worthy of love. I also had a crush on this boy from school, and when we played at my house I would ask him to pretend he kidnapped me, but since he was way too innocent I basically had to tell him where and how I wanted to be touched.
Then when I was a teenager I wrote hundreds of rape fanfiction, and on top of all this shit I developed an "ugly bastard" kink thanks to hentai.
At some point when I was fourteen, I would purposefully go to parties with older guys and walk back home taking the "ugly" streets in hopes I'd get raped. I must have the hardest working guardian angel because it never happened.
So not only I was fantasizing about rape since I was six. I was also forcing a boy to molest me at eight and actively seeking to get raped at fourteen. Oh, and I love loli and shota hentai.
What worries me is that as an adult, I have fantasized about having my way with a minor. I hate to admit it and it's fucking disgusting.

>>7848
>I have fantasized about having my way with a minor. I hate to admit it and it's fucking disgusting.
tbh most teenage boys are horny and degenerate and woud feel pride if an older girl "put the moves" on them
unless you're talking about diddling kids, in which way it is disgusting.

>>7848
go to therapy go to therapy go to therapy IMMEDIATELY

>>7862
if its fiction and imagination who cares. just never reflect it to irl.

The amygdala, the brain nucleus responsible for the onset of sexual salience, is also responsible for potentiation of emotions of fear, aggression, violence.
The amygdala communicates with the hypothalamus proper, because sexual arousal and motivational salience is a complex process. There have to be threshold potentials in the Anterior hypothalamic nucleus for thermoregulation, sweating, shorter breathing, the Paraventricular nucleus & Supraoptic nucleus for oxytocin and vasopressin release (depending on the gender), Pituitary gland main/posterior for oxytocin, vasopressin, gonadotropes, lactotropes release, and even the Tuberomammillary and Posterior nucleus for pupil dilation, alertness, increase of ATP production. To name a few notable regions.
The amygdala also communicates with the nucleus accumbens of the reward system via the D1 motivational salience dopaminergic system, to facilitate gratification anticipation, and the 5-HT system for contentedness and reward.
The amygdala also communicates with the somatosensory system of the parietal lobe to initiate sympathetic, autonomous, and parasympathetic processes that facilitate proceptive and receptive mating behaviors.
The amygdala also communicates with the orbitofrontal cortex to inhibit lateral decision-making, compartmentalization, and risk-aversive behaviors.

Women, due to neuroanatomy and neurochemistry, can experience dissonance and due to the effects of neural facilitation, conflate sexual arousal and salience with the emotions of helplessness, threat, loss of control, aversive salience(D2 system) to being subjected to violence, et cetera.

There is some preliminary work being done on supposed selection pressures for the trait, predisposition, and manifestation, but there is a lot of stigma, unsurprisingly. The zeitgeist is that women experience rape fantasies because it frees them from the patriarchal/misogynistic stigma with regard to female sexuality, and also rids them of the agency of having sexual thoughts and an active sexuality. It's flimsy and isn't rooted in neuroscience, but it is inoffensive.
One lazy argument is that the women that were able to cope and internalize being raped, were more successful in replicating their genes, which eventually morphed into strong genetic associations through hundreds of generations. The women that were aversive to the point of resisting and fighting their aggressors, tended to suffer injury, get murdered, or get ostracized which translated in a loss of protection, access to resources. That means such traits were selected against over the span of hundreds of generations.

The counter-argument is that human beings have not been under a tournament-selection paradigm for many hundreds of thousands of years. Anatomically modern humans pivoted to extended family units, where rape was disincentivized, for at least the last 120,000 years, and have operated under loose systems of socially enforced monogamous paradigms for tens of thousands.
Conversely, men, have had selection pressures for aggression, domination, mate-guarding, risk-seeking. Again, the amygdala is responsible for the conflation of aggression and sexual salience. Again, men that were aggressive and risk-prone tended to be more successful in replicating their genes.


Psychosexual development is very complex, and it is widely known that stressor events during early development, or exposure to paraphilias or overt sexual content during early development, is extremely deleterious. The biggest drive for dopamine is novelty. If you are exposed to novel stimuli of sexual content before your brain has had the chance to sufficiently develop its neural pathways and networks, you run the risk of creating pathways of motivational salience through stimuli that are axiomatically detrimental to your overall wellbeing and further development.

All that "sex-positive" obsession directed at children, all that pornography on the internet, all that erosion of the moral fabric, have real consequences on the psychosexual development of people, and their mental health in general.

>>7868
tl;dr

>>7862
thats absolutely true. Once boys are around 12, most of them wanna fuck older women(though mostly 16-25 year olds, not like 50 year old moms unless theyre milfs i guess). All my male friends said so, so who am i to not believe them

>>7848
>What worries me is that as an adult, I have fantasized about having my way with a minor. I hate to admit it and it's fucking disgusting.
as long as you dont do anything in real life, who cares. We arent at the level of technology where the government can arrest you for thought crimes lol

>>7757
The majority of human reproduction in pre-state societies was through rape. When women enjoy sex, the rate of fertility is higher. Thus, when men raped a group of women, some were more likely to bear children. Repeat that like 10 million times and you end up with a large chunk of the population "enjoying" some level of noncon or roughhousing.
>>7848
For what it's worth, I don't think pedophilia and and rape fantasies are as strongly correlated as people might think. That's two separate issues. That said, I don't think wanting to be intimate with a teenager is that big of an issue. It's not like teenagers don't fuck already, and it can be understandable to look to younger people when people your own age or older don't put out.
That said, I don't know how old you are or what kind of shit you're into, i.e. whether you're like a boomer wanting to fuck a 10y/o or a 20-something lusting after high-schoolers in anime

I only get violent and disturbing fantasies when I feel like shit about myself tbh.

>>15204
I guess that got carried over to men since a sizeable chunk of them fantasize about getting raped and being submissive at least sometimes.

>>15207
>carried over to men
While that's plausible, it's more likely that the submissiveness seen in some men is specifically the result of selection in how men compete with other men. To continue on my tirade about pre-state societies:

"Back in the day" up to about half of male fatalities (depending on how many died to other extreme shit and so on) were the result of interpersonal violence: specifically, fighting over raping women (not food or territory or whatever people like to cope and say it was), resulting in the ratio of men to women in the reproducing population being around 1 to 10 or 1 to 20. Hypothetically, let's say you're an early-agricultural mountain-man incel: your two options in life are to either challenge the gigachad at the top and die, leaving a skeleton covered in cranial fractures for us in the future to find, or submit to the gigachad (e.g. providing your labor, protection, etc.) and live, giving you a tiny chance of scoring it with one of his rape harem. Nations formed around this core idea. Once again, this was repeated for all of human history, which then results in modern men wanting to get pegged.

Of course, from an individual risk/reward perspective, always fighting and killing other moids is the more successful strategy, but this results in such excess male death that those societies simply could not develop and were eventually out-competed by others. A society in which men only know to kill each other is a society in which things like armies or collective work are simply impossible.

>>15209
Sounds to me like submissiveness can be adaptive in many different ways for both genders. I don't like reducing this to just a few social dynamics from the past personally.

I never had a rape fantasy but in 2022 this one moid I had a crush on stopped being friends with me and was borderline harassing me for a while and I hadn't found another person to crush on so when I was masturbating I was imagining him saying that he'd only leave me alone if I agreed to have sex with him. Idk if that counts, especially cuz in the fantasy I was enjoying it

>>15210
It's not "a few" social dynamics, it is the dominant social dynamic in human history, as well as among many other animals. I don't see what problem you have with this.

>>15225
Because it sounds like just an intellectualized attempt to justify perpetuating shit behavior. It's not correct to begin with and it's more complex than reducing everything to dominance-based dynamics. Even in animals leadership isn't necessarily just a dominance based thing, but also about who has the best skillset for survival.
Rape isn't even a good reproductive strategy for both humans and many animals such as wolves to begin with because both of these require tight social groups for survival that punish antisocial behavior. One can only wonder how this supposed rape-filled psychopathic world led to people developing empathy as the norm.