>>14525Moids have other downsides to being manwhores like child support, or getting STDs, and in some cases reputation damage, some just are stupid and don't care or think that through.
It depends on the social circles and context for if being a manwhore is good for them or not. For dumb or low class moids and more often younger ones, it's taken as a good and powerful thing to have more sex. (Although if a manwhore has more sex by cheating, or knowingly fucking someone with a boyfriend, it's almost never taken as a "good" thing unless they and their social group are total scum.)
At the same time, being a virgin not by choice is viewed as a bad thing, and they can be made fun of for it but they usually don't get exiled unless it's by lunk head jock types. The teasing usually only happens inside that social friend group or at highschool and maybe college. Just walking into some business or hobby 3rd space and figuring out which people are virgins or manwhores is usually nearly impossible. So no one is exiled for not having sex, there are no signs that say you must have had sex with at least one female to enter.
Almost always in higher socioeconomic classes and more often in highly intellectual fields manwhoring is almost always greatly looked down upon. Usually to the point of exiling/distancing the manwhore(s) from the community. Because
1. It's taken as a sign that the man is impulsive and takes uncalculated risks which is dangerous to be around if you wish to maintain status.
2. It can cause a lot of interpersonal drama/dynamic changes depending on who that manwhore gets in bed with.
Fun fact! The group that has the most sex are monogamous married couples. :)
We really need to shame/make fun of everyone being promiscuous to restore balance. This whole we are "empowered" by hedonism and shortsightedness is total bullshit. Super/Treatment resistant STDs are popping up faster and faster every day…
