/meta/ - Board Discussion

>>12156
Sounds hot, I'm in!

>>12135
stra*ght women

>>12156
agreed.

>>12198
but of course the ugly ones will simply be killed

>>12212
they should be considered like, birth defects and killed at birth lmao

Like I said in another thread literally /hb/ can be turned into /hb/–the hobby board. Beauty/health stuff can still be included. That board is already almost dead anyway.

If there's a hobby board then you can actually get more people drawn there for the explicit purpose of finding someone with their exact hobby. It might not be that active but there's no reason why it wouldn't be less active than /hb/ is right now.

Also this is controversial but I think changing it to hobby would be more feminist.

I agree, a hobby board would be good. Let’s change /hb/ to hobby.

I am supportive of new boards but how would it differentiate it between /media/ since most hobbies are media related especially with cc’s user base unless I’m projecting. I feel like /media/ should be getting way more activity but it isn’t for whatever reason and I doubt people would share their creations in a hobby board for the same reason people on lc abstain for posting their art.
I’ve been a bit cynical and thought what’s the point when you could post the same stuff on other websites with more activity and get a discussion easily.
Either way it doesn’t hurt to make a hobby board but I’m worried that it will be so broad or overlaps with /media/ and cause problems.

>>6165
>>6172
I strongly AGREE.

>>6083
So is this just never going to happen?

>>12279
Whitelisting IPs and an account system are only similar if you're being super reductionist about it (unhelpful). Whitelisting IPs is far easier to implement and automate and more difficult to abuse in the long term while disrupting the regular users the least.

Obviously something like a post timer wouldn't be seamless for users, but that's only optional and if you're bothered by spam (CC is super slow anyway so that's probably not an issue). I think you could easily set up a system to reduce unwanted posts that would be invisible for regular users. Do you need me to spell out a specific solution? I'll only do it if they let me be a janny. Otherwise, I'm not doing their work for them.

Some solutions are not worth trying because they're objectively bad and the site admins have limited time and resources to work with. At best, you waste a bunch of time, and at worst, you lose a lot of users.

>>12262
Oh holy shit I just reread the OP
Why the fuck would you whitelist hashes? That's a terrible fucking way to go about it. Jannies, please don't do this (they won't because they're lazy, not because it's a bad idea)

>>12276
Care to elaborate why my post is "retarded"? >>12273

I think cloudflare offers an "anti cp" feature. CC should simply use it.

>>12288
Both you and your post are retarded. Session persistence in dynamic addressing is a non-issue for this. You are not sufficiently informed on this topic to have a constructive or helpful opinion.
Hope that helps.

yep, I sense m*n and AGP crossdressers posting here

>>10177
>>10178
Where are they?

>>10440
Under there

Make me.

>>10177
>>10178
Are these "men" in the room with you right now?

>>4967
Based admin

>>4964
Yikes, ban evasion.
>>4967
I guess that sounds really disturbing, but wouldn’t that technically be allowed on x or nsfw?

>>4941
Ok?? Transgender women are still women?

>>11964
no

>>11964
You really waited 3 years to clap back?

>>11202
you're a free woman

>>11200
I think I've been unbanned! Thank you admin/mods! I'm not sure why it happened cause there was nothing listed for ban reason and now I can post again but if I did anything wrong I'm very sorry!

test

no idea, i was banned ages ago, appeal denied, still don't know why

Testooo

>>2780
yacine

Some guys on a /vt/ groomer thread mentioned it so I came here and then never looked back.

>>11900
Same
And I noticed how obsessed they are about this place

>>2804
you'll get over it

i forgot

>Also here's a seal 🦭
>🦭
whoa