/meta/ - Board Discussion

>>5165
>Somehow, its socially acceptable for men to like younger women, but not me?
How about you don't try to justify liking little boys or being a creep just because moids are pedophiles? Also where the fuck do you think you are? We shit on males for being degenerate pedos all the time, and we will shit on you for being one, too.
And fyi, the character you posted at least looks ambiguous, like the other anon said. I've seen other shotafags post about liking unambiguously prepubescent characters. That's the sort of person that should be banned on sight.

>>5165
shota isn’t a term for young men it’s a term for prepubescent boys, there’s a difference between types like picrel and fetishizing a child and trying to justify the latter is still disgusting. just cause other sites put up with pedo-pandering doesn’t mean cc should

>>5171
>oh yea picrel doesn't count even if he is like 13/14 teehee but below that they have holy bodies that you shouldn't feast your eyes upon
god you amer*cans are mentally ill

>>5173
>you should "feast your eyes upon" children below the age of 13/14
>defending your preference for underage boys at all
Fuck off pedophile. This is why everyone finds you obnoxious.

>>5174
fuming and no argument's so results to " >ok p-pedo!!! " as expected like the typical twitteroid
the cartoon drawing pic related is as " pedo " as another drawing depicting for example a 9 yo, don't play the double standards game

>>5128
Probably best to contact the admin.

>>5129
How do we contact admins? There is a thread in one of the websites on the raid report thread that claims that they are going to raid us.

>>5134
My contact info is on the rules page.

>Potential negative consequences?
The only one I can think of is that other sites might misinterpret the purpose of the board and assume that it's for organizing raids.
>Since it would be hidden, would enough people know about it to post to it if they knew a raid would happen?
I don't think so, they're are still people here who don't know about the hidden board.

>>5086
I clicked that link and the first raid there is literally people printing posters of a friendly bald man as a way of covering graffiti. I didn’t realize that raids looked like that.

>>4889
Would it better if you just send the admin a message on discord?

>>4878
Are Russian anons faced with a captcha prompt? Since it's pretty much well-known at this point that most of these CP rings come from the Slavic world.

>>4878
how do you know it's country-specific?

>>4880
>>4879
>>4878
So that's why I have to do captcha every time and it's buggy as hell… But why Russia?

What does everyone think of needing to solve captcha to post with a name?
I noticed that the "other types of spam" posts, ones talking about the ones about ads or "visit my website to grow your business," nearly always use a name for some reason. It also kind of discourages frivolous namefagging though I haven't seen that as an issue

bump

The sperg on /hb/ is getting kind of out of hand. For how long will people be forbidden from talking about their bodies or posting girls with a figure this sperg doesn't approve of without the thread being derailed and swirling into an infighting mess? It's easy to say to ignore it, but it's shitty that you can't speak your mind without this lolcow refugee newfag/moid putting its claws on your throat every time.

>>4900
I reported the troll and hope she or he gets banned. They're just looking for a shitstorm and managed to derail three threads /hb/ already, disparaging both small and big boobs with different body types. This has got to stop.

>>4900
Omg is that the one getting triggered over insulting both a girl's face and body and then pulls the "b-but I deeply care about women's health! You want everyone to die!" thing to justify it?
Reported her a few times. Thought she'd be off because she's just so disingenuous.

>>4903
Yes it is. It always follows the same formula. "But saying you like xyz bodytype is unhealthy! I am just concerned for young women's health!" while throwing not so subtle insults to their appearence.

It doesn't look like you can hide posts in a thread, but you definitely can hide whole threads from the board index.

>>4176
nta
we don't need a separate report button. just x number of normal reports is fine.

>>4172
Agreed, hope mods consider this. May not be easy but given enough time and effort they can find a couple, I'm sure.

but what about VPN users?

>>4165
We all know when a moid is posting anyway, they can't hide their nature. Just report MORE and never reply to suspected scrotes.

I think that's way too easily abuse-able.
In a raid moids could just spam report on anything.

Same problem here.

same. just a blank page

Same

/media/ now loads, but /feels/ does not.

Now the troon thread won't load ether

>>4725
I'm still pretty new to the site so I wasn't sure if I should make a separate thread or post this in here since it is a relevant topic - my apologies if I should've made my own thread
So this is regarding the friend finder thread or just people posting discord tags and contact info on the site in general. Rule 7 says we can’t call out male posters but what about in the case of them posting discord tags? Like in the friend finder thread the only way a male will get banned is if someone else who had added him posts a screenshot of message logs where he admits he is male. Since reporting him without any proof would be considered a false report I'm assuming, making posting the message logs and calling him out necessary. Is there a way we can have an exception to this rule or something? Also maybe to call out males who lurk and add miners but don't actually post their tags. It’s disheartening posting contact info expecting majority who add to be other girls and instead it’s mostly creepy male lurkers. Being able to post their tags/info so we can preemptively block them before they are even able to add us would help avoid being harassed via messages by them.

>>4891
Sheesh, didn't see that rule. That's rough. I hope the mods respond to you.

Now I really wish there was a against defending creepy things (i.e., pedophilia). So people can literally just report and move on.

>>4892
Same, I hope so too. I just want to be able to make friends with other girls and not have to filter through messages from weird males lol I'm sure others feel the same

>>4725
it seems like there's a lot of meta drama in the friend finder thread as the mods keep on deleting posts of people calling out moids and I think this is very bad as it puts the safety of the girls there at risk.

can we have a meta general thread where we can post such warnings? (or is there one)

>>4895
>mods keep on deleting posts of people calling out moids and I think this is very bad as it puts the safety of the girls there at risk.

Yikes. We mightve got one in the mod team, Otherwise why would you even make that rule, especially since
anons provided proof they're moids.

>>4849
yeah, and it spirals out of control.

maybe the actual real option is to ignore whatever poster seems creepy which I have trouble doing n I'm guilty about it. T_T

>>4864
It's not, we've been asking for containment threads to be enforced over and over again for months now. Some people don't wanna get the memo, so they get banned. That's what bans are for. It's fine, it's not shameful or embarrassing to be banned. You'll be back.

>>4849
I kind of think the mods should make a rule against stuff like defending pedophilia, rape, etc. It's always pedantic and dumb and goes nowhere and as you say, it really is a huge moid indicator.

In turn, I feel like there'd be less dumb arguments over it.

>>4838
I didn’t get a reason for my bad :(

>>4868
Refer to this post >>4842 at most these things deserve a warning.