/meta/ - Board Discussion

He must be just another incel/redpill/mgrat parroting the shit from twitter 2016 to today trying to be edgy/based, since he doesn't have the capacity to think of anything on his own. He must be a little faggot with a lot of sand in his ass, needing a huge black guy to fuck his ass.

>>12307
VPN ban isn't gonna do shit lol, Lolcow tried it and it killed the site and if anything made the issues worse

Someone made a horny thread on /b/ it's not actual porn or CP this time thankfully, just a really moidy post

>>12328
Stop bullying me!

The jak guys are raiding /b/ again.

>>12333
just men being attention whores as per usual

I knew one guy who said he'd post here just to defend men. so yeah they might be the posters defending men

They are the retards trying to make sob posts about how hard it is to be man :( oh nooo
It's not rocket science

I dunno, how would i know, i'm not a moid, lol no way

this only applies if you're retarded but i know a good amount of tifs who lurk female-only imageboards. i doubt anyone here considers them men but they always call themselves male which skyrockets the projected amount of true men.

i guess the only way to tell is by asking them for female hygiene advice. ones even ai would fail at.

>>12192
ok

>>12316
I would answer you, in principle, but i dont really wanna talk about what csam nonas would enjoy

>>12321
bumping off homepage

does this sit even have mods?

so are there words that. get autobanned or something because i got banned on my computer and my phone both for “unspecified reasons”

I don't know but I'll never appeal mine because I know I did nothing wrong and I'm not a jannie bootlicker.

maybe it was the specific combination of words that got you autobanned??

I was banned for the first time during the lc down week, i dont know why as the reason is still not specified and i didnt really say anything baity or offensive

>>11363
i feel the same way it sucks. have you found any spaces yet?

More boards would just dilute things even more

why is there /hb/ but not a single hobby board

holy shit it's wojak

>>12261

I think a hobby board would be a good idea.

>>12156
Sounds hot, I'm in!

>>12135
stra*ght women

>>12156
agreed.

>>12198
but of course the ugly ones will simply be killed

>>12212
they should be considered like, birth defects and killed at birth lmao

Like I said in another thread literally /hb/ can be turned into /hb/–the hobby board. Beauty/health stuff can still be included. That board is already almost dead anyway.

If there's a hobby board then you can actually get more people drawn there for the explicit purpose of finding someone with their exact hobby. It might not be that active but there's no reason why it wouldn't be less active than /hb/ is right now.

Also this is controversial but I think changing it to hobby would be more feminist.

I agree, a hobby board would be good. Let’s change /hb/ to hobby.

I am supportive of new boards but how would it differentiate it between /media/ since most hobbies are media related especially with cc’s user base unless I’m projecting. I feel like /media/ should be getting way more activity but it isn’t for whatever reason and I doubt people would share their creations in a hobby board for the same reason people on lc abstain for posting their art.
I’ve been a bit cynical and thought what’s the point when you could post the same stuff on other websites with more activity and get a discussion easily.
Either way it doesn’t hurt to make a hobby board but I’m worried that it will be so broad or overlaps with /media/ and cause problems.

>>6165
>>6172
I strongly AGREE.

>>6083
So is this just never going to happen?

>>12279
Whitelisting IPs and an account system are only similar if you're being super reductionist about it (unhelpful). Whitelisting IPs is far easier to implement and automate and more difficult to abuse in the long term while disrupting the regular users the least.

Obviously something like a post timer wouldn't be seamless for users, but that's only optional and if you're bothered by spam (CC is super slow anyway so that's probably not an issue). I think you could easily set up a system to reduce unwanted posts that would be invisible for regular users. Do you need me to spell out a specific solution? I'll only do it if they let me be a janny. Otherwise, I'm not doing their work for them.

Some solutions are not worth trying because they're objectively bad and the site admins have limited time and resources to work with. At best, you waste a bunch of time, and at worst, you lose a lot of users.

>>12262
Oh holy shit I just reread the OP
Why the fuck would you whitelist hashes? That's a terrible fucking way to go about it. Jannies, please don't do this (they won't because they're lazy, not because it's a bad idea)

>>12276
Care to elaborate why my post is "retarded"? >>12273

I think cloudflare offers an "anti cp" feature. CC should simply use it.

>>12288
Both you and your post are retarded. Session persistence in dynamic addressing is a non-issue for this. You are not sufficiently informed on this topic to have a constructive or helpful opinion.
Hope that helps.