>>198320 Yeah it's not great. He was only one who was willing to get physically violent towards the male relative who was sexually assaulting her for her whole life including the cops even though he was shit too. The whole situation was bad but I know she isn't. We're both mixed race btw and I support her for doing what she could as a young woman in a bad situation
>>198334 yeah it's like when you see someone walking two pugs and they look fine and then one suddenly starts fighting the other and they both take off
I wanted milk but not that kind of milk. Admin, I know that being admin sucks and I hope you still have a good Christmas. I believe in you. Don't mind people who are hating you. Only fake farmers want the farm gone. I hope we can all find a solution. Everyone don't forget to hydrate, sleep and eat.
>>198321 I don't understand either. Would have it been so difficult to be patient, help her test the site and give her feedback so improvements could be made? If someone couldn't handle doing that they could have just posted here in the bunker threads until LC was stable.
It's like farmers no longer remember that image boards are small sites run by a single person using shitty software based on 20-year-old futaba code and hosted on cheap servers. That used to be part of fun, chaos and drama. Now image boards are expected to work flawlessly like sterile corporate social media sites.
>>198338 I'm not a tranny dumbass I'm just tired of 1/5th of the posts being about men, I see enough of them on a day to day basis I come here because I don't have to see or hear any
>>198329 I kind of feel inclined to browse all the past threads to find the drama and make an effortpost linking happenings for the next thread. I don't really want to browse thousands of posts for it though.
>>198334 this is literally it. i feel bad about how it all spun out of control. i’ll admit i was one of the ones who overreacted about muh site changing and i hope i didn’t contribute to this ending up in such a mess. i don’t even think shaymin has bad intentions, she’s just in over her head, sensitive and feels attacked. and some of that is rightruly, lolcow posters can be really scathing. in an ideal world shaymin would have had thicker skin and could have made a separate beta site to smooth out bugs, slowly gotten the farmers used to the idea of a big change and responded to criticism constructively. oh what could’ve been…
>>198339 >>198337 she doesn't know what she's doing and she's refused help from many people. stop defending her. they are many many imageboards that run fine. i am an oldfag by the way. she didn't have to take the site or do any of this but she volunteered to and she's doing a bad job so it's barely worth it.
>>198346 no one even asked her to redesign the site entirely. she probably doesn't understand code properly which is why she took 2 days to fuck up a template she got from a repository
>>198350 yes hers does look like shit. i'm definitely not ihm. i'm just saying shaymin bit off more than she could chew but it was her decision. she should just put it back and let someone else do it.
>>198352 I never heard of her before, I just found it hilarious she called admin a bpdfag while writing such unhinged texts without any self-reflection.
>>198353 me. none of the steps (clearing the cache and dns, using a proxy, mobile posting, disabling vpn, etc) are working on either site. guess i'm stuck here forever.
on the topic of ihm, i think a lot of anons really needed a wake up to what kind of woman usually browses imageboards because it's not the lc standard userbase. i wish all the crazy anons from /ot/ went to ihms site, they'd fit in better there too.
I’m just surprised after all the shit Shaymin’s seen being an admin it took some idiots saying some mean words to get her to break. Like if you’re an admin or farmhand on lolcow you gotta have some thick skin.
>>198346 The main criticism has been the lack of communication and clarity about the transfer and the condoning of weird farmhand actions. Oh and allowing Kpoop. Only a handful had a problem with the layout, several others immediately were on it to remake the old theme. I don't understand how you can even offer to be admin of anything without having some thick skin, even if you did everything perfectly, you'll still get criticism. It's the nature of things. For all we know the drop that made the bucket overflow was some post made by a troon.
>>198151 Fremont is 15, max 16. I hope she will not be chosen as mod or admin bc of her age. I know because I turned her application down for a server I ran because of that
>>198377 admin clarified later that the text was just a placeholder, but yeah, agree about the lack of communication. although i feel like if admin ignored most of the sperging and just worked things at her own pace, it could've been fine.
>>198383 Unless they got money I doubt they’d be given the site at all considering we’re pretty strict on 18+. All the farmhands are v mysterious but I’m pretty sure they’ve all been age verified somehow.
>>198381 She was kinda right, and being "one of us" doesn't mean shit when everyone is always fighting. Besides I'm always getting accused of being a tranny or pakichan or a samefagger or even elon musk so no I'm not really "one of you"
>>198398 newfags don't understand lc or imageboards or how sisterhood works in them. honestly. a lot of newfags adopted this kind of "everyone for themselves" way of acting unless they get to bully someone. they get upset or dismissive when we talk about wanting to keep board culture, but then try implementing their own and say it's "evolving". they need to work out some of that suppressed anger.
>>198401 No I didn't even lurk the Grimes thread until about 6 months ago, and I wouldn't and have never defended elon. Nona's we're tinfoiling about something Grimes said and I asked for proof she said whatever it was they we're talking about and everyone started sperging at me and it ended with them all agreeing with each other that I was elon.
>>198407 i don't think anyone is saying that. i personally just think /ot/ only anons don't even know what the hell else is going on on the site. we're anonymous, we're supposed to protect the site and the values of anonymous posting.
>>198412 i actually agree with banning vpns. IP addresses don't leak any important information about who's posting and getting rid of spam is more important.
>>198410 They're just generic posts, I'm not tinfoiling or sperging or using obscure vernacular. Some of them are just me agreeing with another post. And even if you think my posts are "bad" what is that supposed to mean I'm not allowed to post here? We all have to agree with eachother and have the same opinions to be here? It's so dumb and juvenile, I've probably been here longer than you and shit was never this irritating and accusatory before
What really annoys me about the whole situation is that people would have shut up about the new layout after a week because they got used to it. People ALWAYS lose their shit whenever there is the slightest change on a website and it's autistic as fuck, but they get used to it super quickly too.
>>198419 yeah I saw your reply here >>198409 within seconds of commenting and just deleted my comment because I knew exactly what you are talking about and it is an annoying phenomenon, you're right
>>198417 >>198421 Our largest export is by and far what normies would consider "cyber bullying." The site is an off-shoot of 4chan's /cgl/. I know a lot of you guys are teenagers and young 20s, but you are not the "good guy" if you're posting on lolcow with enough frequency to want to follow it over here and argue that you're a cool stacey.
>>198436 that's because it was a shitty template. lolcow is a chan style imageboard that needed to be updated, not completely changed to a different type.
>>198409 So it was you. Lmao imagine defending a billionaire deadbeat moid being powr and buwwied and then crying why you aren't accepted on a gossip website for women.
>>198443 >lolcow is a chan style imageboard that needed to be updated Thing is it's written on outdated chan software, and it was modified so heavily that it was hard for newer admins to understand what the fuck was going on. It seems migrating to lynxchan was a smart idea backend wise, but it needed to be executed differently. I see this as a change that was done to help with the development of the backend of the site, for the sake of the admin and mods/jannies, and not for the frontend/UI. Besides frontend is easily fixable, anons making a fuss about it were so obnoxious kek.
>>198444 agree here. /ot/ has a different culture than the rest of the site now in my opinion. it used to be someplace where we could relax after getting autistically angry at eachother, but now it's all infighting coupled with weirdly friendly activities like drawthread and movies. i feel like some users there browse all day and do nothing else and interact with no one else.
>>198424 Ty but wait so you replied to my post twice without stating "samefag?" Isn't that against the rules or whatnot? Forgive me if I'm wrong I'm not trying to start an infight
>>198453 This was completely admins mistake, but the site that went up day before yesterday was an unfinished site full of (apparently) template text like the kpop description for /m/. Later on admin said she'd be migrating /w/, /snow/ and /pt/ to the new board which implies /w/ would not be deleted. She never said /w/ will be gone, but she also made the mistake of not clarifying that it would stay.
>>198428 Well yeah but I don't think anybody thought they were morally righteous. Honestly not even sure I agree with the cyberbullying statement. Reposting a screencap of something someone posted isn't cyberbullying. Normie websites have just as much shittalking as lolcow except you aren't allowed to say anything about trannies over there
>>198458 i'm just trying to say it obviously looked a mess so anons were kind of in the right to sperg. what the real issue is, is admin doesn't know how to code well. she's sloppy and has horrible communication so people are assuming the worst.
>>198460 If your behavior on lolcow is exactly as socially acceptable as your behavior anywhere else, then why are you here? You don't need to argue morals with me and you don't need to feel bad either.
>>198462 Yes, you're sadly totally right. She should have taken some extra time and tested more, it's not like anybody here would have cared if it took longer as long as we got drip fed an update on what's going on every once in a while.
>>198460 >Normie websites have just as much shit talking as lolcow nayrt, but this always cracks me up when people are trying to paint lolcow as this horrible website and I ask them how anonymously gossiping about some public figure is much worse from when us friends gossip about someone we know. One is making a clown of themselves publicly and the other is someone that thinks they're hot shit privately, both cases all parties agree said person need to be taken down a notch. I've never gotten a decent answer lmao
>>198465 Because I like women only online spaces and think it's extremely important to have them. Not everyone who is on lolcow has to be a disgusting outcast kek
>>198412 God, moids really are pathetic. They hate spaces for women so fucking much. Who the fuck was it that had to fight for their own bathrooms and only had their own bathroom spaces (until trannies invaded it)? Fuck off our site. They are so insufferable. Men have always had their own spaces, and still have them. I hate moids so fucking much.
>>198445 What are you talking about? I just said I wouldn't ever defend elon and I didn't. I was asking for proof that Grimes had that secret twitter account because I wasn't familiar with the lore, that's why everyone called me elon. I've posted on there once and never defended anyone, can you read?
>>198447 I know that retard my point is it's annoying that posting anything that goes outside the realm of what everyone agrees with just gets dogpiled on with random "hi cow" or tranny or samefag accusations. I've been here like 7 years and it was never as bad as it's been the past year
>>198475 nta but it's never been that type of woman only space. men were only banned so drama threads wouldn't be like kiwifarms are now. just use this site instead.
>>198475 That's a fair reason to browse, but it also makes you a part of lolcow. Do you think it's terribly "normal" by today's standards to feel like that? Clearly not.
>>198481 that's just because we can't alog. i feel like chronicling some rando camgirl's life to laugh at and poke holes in is kinda cruel meangirls shit that we can do freely without judging eachother or being judged public.
>>198482 There's no need since /ot/, /m/ and /g/ exist. Don't be silly. I've been on lc since its inception but clearly over time it got open to the idea of being a female only space for casual talk, not just gossip. Of course the online gossip is still in the foreground, as it should be since it will deter normies to an extent because of the more vicious board culture.
This kid followed me around the supermarket, trying to get me to play tag with her. I kept asking where her parents were at and she didn't stop following me. I'm not cut out to be a mom.
>>198484 Sorry maybe I need to clarify. I'm not saying I don't consider myself a part of lolcow culture. I'm just defending n0nnies and myself from statements that we are pigs rolling in filth just like ihm. I don't believe we are like at, at least not all of us.
>>198493 honey, it's ok. I don't need a vpn because no one is out to get me. "come and kill me" was hyperbole. you're like someone on a mushroom trip right now lol don't get twisted up about this it's okay, you're okay, I'm okay
>>198490 i'm telling you it's /ot/ posters. they think the entire site is like /ot/. you can tell when they wander into threads too, they will defend cows by claiming we're shitting women when we're just bullying the cows. >uhm actually all breasts are supposed to look like that stupid moid bitch i don't care what other women's breasts look like, this bitch sexually assaulted multiple women and lied about getting raped, she could have perfect breasts and i'll call them ugly.
>>198500 because she's a shit person who likely reads her thread and it upsets her. also when women get naked for moids they don't need to be defended from moid standards.
>>198495 >>198499 I'm not upset kek. If you think lolcow is a cyberbullying site that makes you guys gross outcasts, that's alright. It's just the same as any normie site except troon shittalking is allowed.
>>198511 literally the posters that constantly sperg about "women tearing other women down" and getting mad at cow threads are always radfems, how am i wrong?
>>198509 no one wants men there, but the fact is they were banned for being annoying, not to make lolcow a woman's space. it's just a side effect of banning the men. know your damn place.
>>198514 neither are /ot/ posters but this entire thread is shitting on us for no reason when it's not even us that usually say the shit we're being accused of
>>198518 it's def radfems who get triggered at any mention of "beauty standards" and get mad when you call other women ugly, that's why 2X was hidden and not ot
>>198513 i don't think it's radfems. more the annoying "women all have high octane empathy" holier than thou posters. some may be radfems, but people who get mad at us for tearing down cows are thinskinned women should be lovelies types.
>>198513 radfem n0nnies please do not come for me this is just anecdotal from browsing, but this is not true. Radfem nonas will leave you to the wolves if you do something they do not like, such as wearing makeup
>>198538 anon is telling me to kill myself because i said that the site wasn't designed to be a woman's space and men were only banned because they think with their dicks and the way the site is now is a byproduct of that. i was never mad. don't know why some anons don't get that and need to sperg out.
>>198542 >oldfags that adopted radical feminism but who brought radical feminism to the site? it wasn't just a collective realization or pop up out of nowhere. it was newfags who were radfems
>>198517 there are DNS issues that won't resolve for up to 72 hours or something according to the discord chat with shaymin. for many nonitas the site is still inaccessible. >>198537 /B3vsZTa8
>>198523 Oh, I've seen Admin post the DNS issues were sorted out, so I thought that problem was fixed. Weird that my Hungarian ISP manages to connect, but even American anons struggle to see lolcow
>>198501 I managed to lose her in the freezer section. She suddenly got bored I guess and went back to her parents. I was almost worried the gods were punishing me with one of my worst nightmares. Please, can people watch their kids better?
>>198561 They really should be watching her better holy fuck. What if she started following around some creepy moid? She could have been kidnapped or worse.
>>198560 i was never fighting. anon came at me because i pointed it out. she also posted >>198475 calling drama anons disgusting outcasts. she's totally in the wrong.
>>198553 Anons were kicked out for manhate and troonhate and were accused of being redditfags, BEFORE r/gendercritical got banned. They only reversed the ban on the topics when r/gendercritical got banned. I remember, because I left during that period, despite being an oldfag.
Since these bunker threads are clearly going to continue for a while I made a template linking important things that have happened in the bunker so if any nonn1es new to the threads come in they don't have to be spoonfed. Should this be used as a template for future threads? ~~~
>>198571 if you let a man in your house or give birth to a son and don't immediately kill them then whatever happens after that is your own fault in the eyes of the radfems (I say this with affection for them)
>>198587 Samefag but I used to only lurk the pro ana scumbags thread and there was a drastic shift a couple/few years ago when the radfem newfags arrived. I saw old posts mocking posters by saying shit like "are you a feminist??? cringe." And then suddenly it shifted to radfem opinions
>>198567 >>198589 Samefagging to say, let me just clarify. I was saying drama anons aren't disgusting! The person I was replying to was saying we are and that we need sisterhood. I was trying to say we are normal people and aren't some outcast freaks, but if they want to label themselves as that then they are fine to do that I guess
>>198581 >Hello fellow females, it's so sad radfems ruined lolcow. Oops, seems like someone is spamming gore, cp and porn what a coincidence. Anyway, us oldfags know that akschually men only have been unwanted recently, when those radfems from reddit were ruining lolcow with their politics. Did you know the original admin was a man? You /ot/ radfem newfag females should take a seat and respect us- I mean those men who built your side.
I thought women were becoming more radfems due to the amount of CP/tranny threads they were and raids of men posting rape and gore in these threads. Say shit about radfems all you want, I'm a straight radfem with a husband, but I had these girls who helped me when I came out about these men. I'd prefer women who at least somewhat cared about s (instead of women who perpetuate abuse against women like Shatna and pedopanders). I do understand theres a lot of people who call themselves radfems and never actual read theory, but the whole point of being a radfem is to help women out of the system, bad women included. I make fun of people like Shatna, but thats because she also told 14 yo radfems to "take it up the ass".
>>198597 well i was never arguing with you. i am arguing with the faggot calling us all men. forgive me i'm tired. the anon who responded for you is a raging freak who doesn't respect lolcow's roots.
>>198598 >Everyone who disagrees with my post is a man!
Also I'm not involved in your infight about when the men arrived or were banned or whatnot lol, go touch grass and calm down a bit, it's not that deep.
>>198598 This. After that comment of "know your place" made me a bit uncomfortable. We cannot pretend like there arent male posters who raid this site constantly, who go as far as to laughing at us.
Males have had their own spaces for years. Women had to fight for bathroom spaces, and just about two decades ago or so we finally had them. We were not even able to speak without a man present, specifically our husbands. I don't understand why these people can't understand why we're a bit reluctant onto seeing posters who are against women spaces. When men get in, they make it inherently sexual, look at the state of /a/ and even /lit/, how it always has images with sexual intentions.
I dont know how we're getting blamed and pinpointed when we had male posters who have spammed gore of women. There are rape forums for women who has been spammed S&M and men pretending to be women to laugh about it. Pic rel.
idk do you really think an imageboard owner would be a hot or normie looking and behaving adjacent? a ib owner from before even the 2010s even? come on. and she doesn't type like a man it's so clear that some of you really didn't use the internet past facebook before 2012. she types like someone her age. she's not that cute and she's fat, and that's expected.
>>198601 ex scene kid who looked up to kiki kannibal and found her thread one day. But honestly why is it bad if I think myself and other anons are normal? I really don't understand why this is a problem. Why does everybody who is on lolcow have to be this strange idea of some weirdo outcast? Why do you not want me to say that I think you and other women on the site are not outcasts but are just normal??? I genuinely don't understand why I am getting anons telling me to leave over this kek.
>>198612 i told anon to know her place as in on lolcow as a newfag who thinks the site was meant to cater to /ot/ because she responded with unnecessary hostility to something i posted to another anon.
>>198599 I sympathize with radfem talking points, but I'm not someone who studied any "canon" texts or leading figures. For me male depravity and insane laziness is just something that I see in my daily life both online and offline, while women bust their asses. I just don't get the interest in sex worker cows. I knew Moo, because she had sexual assault allegations against her, but even trying to look back in Shayna threads all I found was just cringe I don't want to see (including her dolphin vagina), but I do not see anything rage inducing, it's just sad.
>>198615 You can think whatever you want, but you can't both be a frequenter of cowboards AND be so sensitive that you can't handle an unflattering metaphor. Which was the full extent of my posts, I'm none of the people who have started fighting about radfems and calling each other men.
>>198619 Yes I can. Im a straight radfem who has read critcal theory and have owned radfem groups. I even have a radfem twitter. I want women to have a space to go to, and I have always been pro women. I only want daughters. >>198623 Oh, my bad. I did not know that, I thought you meant it about the whole man making the site thing. Sorry!
>>198626 the misunderstanding is probably because some people misinterpreted >>198372 which was obviously meant in a "we're all mad here" kind of way. not in a "we're the same as ihm" way.
>>198625 I think any woman who cares about women and would not put their nigel over them is a good start. For me, even though I have a boyfriend, I make sure my nigel respects his mother and the women in his life. I make sure how he treats people who have it less than him, and how he treats older women for example. I do not believe a woman can be a radfem if she is willing to put her man over her female friends (for example, if he has rape allegations, etc). It's sad, but a lot of women do excuse these types of men, especially their nigels. You do not have to be extremely active, but I think just being pro women is a good start.
>>198645 in political lesbian radfem circles even partnering with a moid makes you disqualified from radical feminism, it's why "not my nigel" is a phrase
>>198628 huh? /pt/ was made for pixyteri discussion after it was banned from /cgl/ no? i think i'm just misunderstanding kek. i mean it looks like it stands for it
>>198630 no worries. anon misunderstood me because she was responding to something i directed at a different anon and i didn't realize because she didn't say she wasn't her(even though she claims to be an oldfag she doesn't have any board etiquette and is calling me a man because she misunderstood me)
Okay I'm being confused as multiple different people. I am >>198407 , >>198460 , >>198475 , >>198494 , >>198508 … the original post I was replying to I interpreted it as anon saying that we are all yucky outcast weirdos who cyber bully. All I have been trying to say is that it's really not fucking weird to look at cowboards and participate in them. Because it is the same exact behavior on normie sites like reddit and twitter. I think we all misunderstood eachother and are all on the same side?
>>198645 This doesnt mean all women btw. There are multiple horrible women, though a lot of horrible women, including mothers go through a cycle of abuse. A lot of damaged mothers have had less chances and the solution is to also see them as still women.. A lot of women are terrible humans for their nigel's approval, and unless they start hurting other women, then I try to help. When they go as far as hurting their own sisters, then it's a lost cause. >>198646 I understand that, however that still doesnt make me less of one. I dont understand why youre trying to segregate us unless you are specifically anti radfem. I would never choose my nigel over another woman if a woman came to me about one.
>>198647 nta but it went >/cgl/ drama ban >staminarose (nuked) >lolcow which was only /pt/ initially then kiwifarms came shortly after that so josh could have an identity and get his dick sucked for his amazing posts.
Anyone wanna infight about "gnc" women? They remind me of nlogs because they always think they're better than other women for not wearing makeup or having short hair lol. And then they perpetuate the same stereotypes as trannies, like insinuating being a women means performing stereotypical feminine acts and because they're not feminine they have to put "gnc" in front of it.
>>198647 Yes, but the timeline was dramaban on cgl(which was around 2011?) > dramaposting migrates to sr > sr gets closed down because admin got pissed at false pedo accusations to pt (around 2014?) > lolcow gets created as substitute
>>198657 Both of those posts are me. I stand by what I said, you are acting very sensitive. I am extremely disappointed that this needs explained this thoroughly, but what the other anon said here >>198641 is correct.
>>198654 i just thought you should know what most radfems think of willingly hetpartnered women kek. they basically view you as the embarassing reality inconvenient to their ideology, or if they are hetpartnered they're embarassed about that too
Lord have mercy, my parents invited my alcoholic uncle for christmas eve. Just kill me already he's going to ruin everything by arguing with my father like a retarded child.
>>198672 You can think I'm sensitive all you want, I'm trying to understand why I'm the only anon singled out instead of the multiple other anons who said the same fucking thing. If going after me specifically helps you feel better, then cool I really don't give a fuck because we are fucking anonymous
>>198661 I'm not really GNC, unless you count not wearing makeup as some attack on the system, but I always interpreted n0nnies said GNC because that's what they're observed as by others, who keep reminding them how non-woman they are. Unlike trannies who intentionally go out of their way to dress and move in the manner of the other sex, and are angry when they're told what they are. GNCs aren't really offended either way.
>>198665 No that's what I'm saying, being a woman isn't about stereotypical femininity that's why it's weird gnc women have to create a whole new category for themselves just for not feeling or looking stereotypically feminine
>>198671 Apparently some of you do lol, don't speak for the group
>>198677 I'm saying every woman is a woman regardless of appearance or personality traits, what is nloggy about that?
>>198661 No. Im a tomboy who has a lot of feminine friends. Gnc women are usually gnc due to being pressured to troon out. I was one. I am not against makeup, I am against the industry and standards and cosmetics being induced onto girls as young as 12. I was forced to be feminine as a girl and was told that my only thing was to have children, and believed that anything like my ambitions was being emotional, and that I, a woman, should not have them. I learned to appreciate being myself. Feminine women are still women, just like women who arent feminine. The idea of "femininity" is a construct and was meant to put down women as people automatically believe to be a female is to be a failed male (which is false), hence they made up femininity. Women are not in a box, and they have interests that can go for anything. However, I am gnc because I do not want young girls to be pressured to starve themselves or to indulge into surgeries such as labia removal to be a perfect sex doll. Women should be able to indulge in whatever they want without feeling "prettier" because of cosmetics or being pressured by anything outside of that. I still like frilly clothes and adore animals, but I also like boxxing and coding. Women are their own. Stop pinning women against each other and making fun of them. Im against gnc women making fun of those women, but women simply stating theyre not wearing makeup are usually congratulating themselves for that, usually because theyve been put in a box where they had to, doesnt mean other women who wear it are less women than them.
>>198682 i meant that "nlog" originally meant girl who tries to separate herself from other girls. people who call themselves "gnc" are doing that, making them nlogs
>>198665 that went right over your head. how can one be gender non conforming without needing to view femininity isn't intrinsically female? you're not being non conforming against gender unless you think gender is stereotypes.
>>198675 Fuck off. I dont care about you trying to segregate me from the only women who's been there for me. You are fucking terrible. The only women who's been there for me, at my lowest when I was abused and groomed was radfems.
>>198687 Yeah sure, that's separating yourself. It's totally not separating to act hostile and weird towards anyone who doesn't conform. Without the bullying, shunning and pressure, there wouldn't be a reason to say you don't conform.
>>198661 agree. being gnc is just being nonbinary for women who don't want to call themselves some genderspecial term. they're just trying to opt out of woman's issues by pretending to be above them.
>>198694 huh? maybe i just don't want to be feminine and don't feel comfortable doing those things. why should i? there's nothing wrong with them but they're just not for me
>>198696 "femininity" is just a label/stereotype for the whole female gender. calling yourself "gender non conforming" is LITERALLY calling yourself nlog by name
>>198698 No, sorry, Im tired of people telling me im not radfem or that radfems would hate me for being het. I just don't understand that hate for all that when I was posting about how moidposters were spamming CP and whatnot and they said nothing about it, but are trying to tell me im not a radfem for having a nigel.
>>198692 tbh i've never been "bullied" by other girls for having my own style even when i was a tomboy… i think it's mostly the insecure girls who had their own issues and were already weird to other girls that said that
stop the divide i want a tomboy girlfriend and there are NONE in my area. lesbians i mean they're always surprisingly straight. not that i'm against that or anything
>>198683 >Stop pinning women against each other and making fun of them. I'm not I'm inquiring about the term gnc, also this is a lolcow thread. There are entire boards dedicated to making fun of certain women lol
>>198702 Just ignore the very young, incredibly unrealistic baby radfems. Some women will talk as if a plan of total separatism or half of the world (XY) going extinct within the next decade is pragmatic to plan for
>>198696 you don't have to be feminine, but you don't have to make a point that you're not, especially when stereotypical femininity isn't intrinsically female. many gnc women are overly critical of women who are stereotypically feminine, which i disagree with. just because something goes with the status quo doesn't mean it's bad. same with going against it. i also see gnc women treat gc women like they're brainwashed and can't possibly enjoy feminine things because they actually do, hence the nonbinary comparison. some people are like that.
>>198700 i'm not calling myself anything and neither am i any of the previous anons i was just saying. but while we're on the topic what else am i supposed to say? i don't dress like my friends that's all
>>198708 I guess thats a fair point then. I never liked the term "GNC", but I assumed it was terf leaning women. Though, when I think of it, a lot of "gnc" women are more liberal feminists than what you're saying, but that's probably due to different social media platforms. Most "GC" women I see are handmaidens. Sorry, .
When I hear someone say "gnc" I just think of detransitioners and people who care way too much about their self image. Who cares what's "gender conforming"?
>>198713 gender is just language. it comes directly from sex, female, feminine. it would be applied to sex in some way regardless because males and females want to be distinct from eachother.
i think the term tomboy-ish to describe your style is fine, perhaps a bit juvenile, but who else cares about their style so much as young people anyways. like people calling themselves goth because they dress a certain way/listen to certain music.
>>198721 I wish people would drop the whole gender thing. Sex is what matters. Especially because trannies have purposely tried to confuse as many people as possible with changing the definitions and whatnot
>>198724 I like describing myself as a tomboy, but recently, I have realized a lot of men use it as a fetish. Now, I am not so sure. I used it because it was my way so people wouldnt call me a he/him etc. Im not so sure now..
>>198719 agree here. i can enjoy the things i like but still be slightly critical of why i enjoy them. i personally hate labels. i just want to like what i like whether i "should" or not.
>>198728 moids fetishize every single thing, don't let them live rent-free in your head, n0nnie. enjoy whatever you like. my friend calls me tomboy-ish but i don't necessarily 'label' myself that way, i like what i like.
>>198725 yes, exactly. it's fucking annoying. it's probably easier to get a tranny diag this way, men just need to say they like dresses and "girly" stuff.
Ngl not using imageboards for a few days did wonders to my mental health. I ate healthy, I worked out, I’m learning a new language. See you in Pure Stacy Land n onnie s love you
>>198739 what if i told you i am both? >eat healthy and cook every day >exercise atleast 40 minutes a day >have loving social relationships >take a shower and wash my face daily >sleep at normal hours >have a clean house >ree at cows and shitpost
>>198739 Personally it's imageboards that helped me do a lot of things and that gave me a shit ton of advice I wouldn't have received anywhere else. Especially lc but even /adv/ on 4chan has helped me get outside opinions I really needed at times. As long as you find a healthy balance between real life and online interactions I don't see how imageboards should be a problem.
these past few months i somehow felt hormonal after literal years of being asexual since i was a teenager and it was so intense that i literally couldnt think about anything else for like a month. no changes in diet or conscious changes mindset or anything it just magically happened. feeling more homosexual than ever before, which is bad because there's no way i'll ever be able to experience anything in my muzzie country. sigh. well it's one of if not the most open liberal one when it comes to stuff like this so at least i'm not in pakistan or afghanistan whatever
>>198713 >>198714 >>198715 >>198725 >>198738 So based >>198723 So… just a woman who acts in ways not stereotypically associated with femininity. How is that not sexist? Lol I'd be offended if someone tried to label me as different from most women for not wanting kids.
>>198765 right, just the whole gnc thing has always been so weird to me. why would you want to label yourself that unless you have some sort of grudge against other women. i mean i get it, not everyone likes to wear makeup or dresses, but to make a whole identity out of it is definitely NLOG behavior.
>>198763 but also what country for any straight s that might be interested just for the info? is it denmark? because i keep hearing horror stories from women of danes not wanting to use condoms ever
>>198779 Shaymin was right, and the lolcow autism is simply not worth it. Hoping she finally kills the website for good. Lets focus on better things from now on s.
>>198775 It's so nice hearing other nonas feel the same way, I would get dogpiled on so hard for saying any of this in ot. One of they're arguments was even something along the lines of "well men put us in a different category for not being feminine so why shouldn't we do the same?" I was dumbfounded.
>>198793 literally n0nnas in this thread tried to do that too, i just ignored them lol, why would you ever want to adopt the label moids give you, couldn't be me
>>198784 I come from a country with an unsexy language too. I have stuck to hooking up with foreigners and tourists, because then I have an excuse to just dirty talk in English. I don't know how to do it in my own language and make it sound sexy. This isn't sustainable. I wish to move to a different country to guarantee everything being in English.
Do you guys remember how autistic the official lolcow discord was before it was locked down? It was full of unironic scrotes, and the mods were weirdly bitchy. I still wonder why/how it had such a shit atmosphere compared to the actual site.
>>198802 out of all the nordic languages which is the sexiest? i'm a svenskaboo so i'll say swedish but my friend's older sister told me they sound like frogs once so i don't think many would agree with me.
I can empathize with zoomer kids freaking out about "30 year olds on my site???" since someone jokingly said going to mumsnet or me visiting ovarit and thinking "god, I don't want to talk to these internet-adapter 50 year-old women"
>>198805 I would like a bit more of a longer term fwb situation. Trying to get with whatever tourist stops by, is a bit of a crapshoot. One already tried to drag me into a pyramid scheme. So I've been wary since.
>>198815 I'm similiar, but I wouldn't say "oh I wish LC was gone". I use LC from time to time to blogpost my shitty life, but I'm very attached to the culture or the cow side of the IB. But if you're truly indifferent, you wouldn't wish for it to be gone or destroyed
>>198833 agreed. Not everyone has to share the same opinion lmao. Also its just the neets and losers who are scared of admin """pulling the plug""" because then they would be forced to move on with their lives get a new hobby and get a job.
>>198830 Something about beer. This brand was sponsoring this group's travel and they were going allover Europe. When we left the coffeeshop together, this group of copypaste blondes were standing outside, giggling, waiting for us and waving. I was really freaked out and they still invited me to a party later. I have watched enough horror movies to know where that would go, so I noped out. She heavily implied I could get to smash if I went to the party, but no no no I'm not going to get myself into that situation. Bad vibes.
>>198852 Yes I can because you let something as stupid as how people talk to each other get in the way of how you gauge their intelligence. Fuck you and your myopic bitchiness