>>318693You silly westerner. The entirety of Western bloc governments is corrupt to the core.
No wilful, moral or competent agent can get overturn such bullshit via mere legalese because it is subordinated by the corrupt, - partly by design, - and can't get there, because inevitable and predictable disagreements by way of morality, ideology or ambition leads to a full house clean up.
It cannot not lead to it.
UK govt for instance is so corrupt they don't even care about their own power base.
What actual, self-respecting, ambitious and capable sovereign doesn't bother to protect their own subjects, or command their loyalty? They don't care.
Pertinent to your question, people like Mr. Paul are ultimately ineffective, impotent and useless.
It absolutely does not matter what men like him think or care about - they are either in-doctrine by means of blackmail, systemic hazing initiation rituals (such as those in unis), are in-doctrine of their own volition, - complete with any amount of self-rationalization and delusion of any quality on their part to excuse difference between the observed reality and any desired state of affairs, - lack the necessary amount of resources and will to make a full coup, lack any conviction, and/or are too dumb, weak or cowardly to bring any change.
Or simply don't care, quite possibly even resenting commoners.
The system still exceeds his capability to overcome thus far, regardless.
Here's a perspective for you to contemplate: do you know why US government doesn't need to abolish amendments like 2nd?
It is because common Americans are inferiors who don't pose unsolvable threats - thus far. The very gun sphere of the US is a microcosm of American condition. An average US firearm appreciator can own any gun within limits. He can own all sorts of ammo, a great deal. It's fun, it's practical. It is power.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text. 
