>>335629
the status quo

>>335565
what is "aggressively heterosexual"? but also, you can't change sexuality, otherwise 90% of women would be lesbian

>>335632
That's hardly an answer. What does "status quo" entails in this context?

>>335635
faux women's liberation (access to women's bodies under the guise of empowerment), hyper-individualism (person can do anything they want individually with no concern how it affects society), allowing men to infiltrate womens spaces, thinking religion can co-exist with feminism, etc

the word conservative means nothing nowadays

>>335249
>"ackshually you're a nazi because you don't want women to be whores"

>but also whores don't owe you solidarity.

>Why is it so hard to admit you're just an entirely self-serving attention whore and you're hiding behind feminism just so you can still vent about how shitty men are despite your income being dependent on them

Nevertheless you completely failed to sound like a woman moid

This just in the rapey mother exploiting shitstain needs to get a lobotomy for all mankind

>>335251
I found a GC friendly, NO male mods allowed, sub on reddit

r/TrueTwoX

>>335251
Alot of hobby subs are full of advertising now and that bums me.
>>335259
I'll check it out but its only a matter of time til it gets banned

Have fun when it lasts, it will get infected again later anyway

>>335576
this is only applicable in situations in which person is fully aware the person they're with is an abuser and do nothing to leave while also complaining to everyone how shitty their abusive partner is.
read too many stories and even my own friend is the same way. she would complain how shitty boyfriend is, and then still let him in her house, have sex with him and hang out with him and cook for him. everyone asked her why the hell she's with him, and she'd just say "oh he's better now so it's ok", and when he was shitty to her again she'd block him for a week or so, rinse and repeat.
he was actually the one to leave her, around a month ago he ghosted her and now has a diff gf. she, of course, is depressed post-break up. and he had 0 redeeming qualities. never got her gifts, never took her to dates where he paid, even when they flew somewhere she 100% paid for herself. he was only nice to her for the first few months. how do some women get attached to these scumbags and then live in denial is beyond me, are they just that scared to be single?

>>335577
meant for >>335551

yeah grooming is for kids, as an adult you get manipulated, not seduced.
Usually it's out of some sort of dependency, like money, a job, introducing you to drugs, etc.

>>335577
yeah fear of being single is a big one, especially for women who internalize the belief they need to acquire a husband & birth children before they stop ovulating or they're failures as women. and there's everything >>335622 just mentioned. there's also the manipulation tactic of giving them a really wonderful experience early on, and just milking it & reminding them of it forever, with the false promise that their relationship will return to that beautiful way it used to be if only they hold on a bit longer or give them another chance. i've seen that & heard friends & acquaintances talk about having to deal with that so many times, because it works on a lot of people who aren't prepared for it.
i don't know if it's that tactic or something else with this shitty boyfriend, but learning that it's a deliberate tactic and steeling themselves against it for the future can help.

I'm guessing that term "grooming" is derived from the wedding tradition, there used to be brides and grooms.

beans are very good for you and you should keep eating beans

counterintuitively, more beans will reduce chances of butt cancer and adjust your microbiome to reduce gas when you eat them in the future. best poops of my life happened from regularly eating beans. keep em coming, queen.

They go away the more you eat them
t. ex vegan

>>335617
WELCOME WORLD TO THE BEANS IN MY ASS

>>334853
Sf, visited today and loved the straight content in sp, sending a thank you into the void for that one image dumper. Your taste is delicious

Really this says it all.

The average user of Witchan is also on Junkuchan (site made for men btw) raging about how not everyone on Lolcow/CC likes gay porn and sperging about "muh moralfags" whenever you say racebait is bad

When they started allowing yuripedo threads I knew the site was doomed. I was so disgusted I sent the website to several of my male discord friends who admit to being regulars on it now and with all the complaints about it and it going down I'm glad my attempts to destroy these pedos seems to be succeeding. I've ruined incel forums by tipping women off to their existences, this will be the same. Let this be an example to all image board owners, DON'T ALLOW CP!

>>335544
Samefag, apparently the witchan people found this post and posted it to Lolcow pretending it was about LC even though I actually like Lolcow for banning pedos. Hating loli isn't anti feminist, I hate loli because it sexualizes young girls, women who sexualize young girls are spiritually the same as moids/troons. I admit this was all ragebait to see how easily I could piss off Nimu and it seems it worked very well, I'm a crypto farmer and none of my friends online or irl know I use Lolcow. I just hate Nimu and wanted to see what her response would be if she thought men were on her site, it was clearly to self post on various sites. Nimu your website is for racists and pedos we all know your top user is Rikka, your Christcuck racist CP troon site will die and Lolcow will reign supreme

>>334845
The admin is a christian fundie moid trying to convert occult girls
its all really sus

I think eye shape has a place in it. For example, if Elizabeth Holmes had less strangely shaped eyes it'd be less scary.

does eye contact by any chance make you feel uneasy?

I think straight black eyes are the wierdest. They always look uncanny.

Blue eyes only look creepy to me in old tintype photos where you can only see the pupil. Those give me genuine nightmares

I was gonna disagree but I just realized most of the blue eyed guys I'm attracted to have fairly dark blue eyes so maybe you have a point.

If it creates too stark a contrast with the rest of a person's face, it can certainly look odd; however, I think the beauty of blue eyes actually lies in that very contrast, whereas brown eyes tend to give a softer appearance

There are very few word combinations mroe revolting than "niche celebrity"

I remember him and there was a troll thread about him semi-recently. I'm 99% sure he was associated with Rikkafag but Autismo seemed to hate Catholics meanwhile I'm pretty sure Rikka is one

Discord friendfishers never succeed so most likely just gave up

>>335353
>It means banning people purely because you don't like their view points and not because they broke any rules.
No? It means a stricter ban policy on what people can say and can’t. Because they’re cucked by rules.

I'm tired of yuripedos and lolipedos they only need medieval torture

>>335355
I don't post on lc and I've never used those terms. I'm not going to defend the aggressiveness but I am going to say that their complaints are real.

I also think calling it misogyny is shitty. Even if they are being aggressive towards other women it's not towards every women. They don't hate women. They just hate shitty women. If you take offense to that then you might just be one of they people they're complaining about but it isn't a blanket statement on all women.

It also sounds like you're expecting wlw communities even on femcel boards to be absolutely unified in some sort of moids bad and my fellow sisters can do no wrong but no. In addition to moids either trying to sneak into our communities through their wives/girlfriends or being trannys we have plenty of backstabbers in the form of bi women experimenting on us and throwing us away.

I'm sorry but it's rough and some people are going to lose it sometimes.

Lolcow is down yet again. Start the clock until the worst posters come here to ruin everything (though they seem to stick to WC and JC more lately since bunker threads were banned)

>>335583
I’m surprised and also unsuprised that this is the onoy post about lolcor being down.