>>325273
It's so obvious you're just some schizoid BPD retard who can't see the bigger picture.

>>325274
Alright, nice talking to you Mr. Gofman

>>325275
Nice talking you, Abdullah Mohammed. Death to the entire Levant.

Some of you don't even realize how influenced your minds are. You know it's just like they say, "The best psyops are the ones that don't even feel like psyops".

>>325277
The psyop that Christianity is anything but just another form of Judaism is the real psyop. Death to Yahweh.

no
unless the marriage is more like a business transaction and he needs to talk to his ex for logistics (managing a business or their kids)
I just wouldn't want to get involved romantically with this

>>312291
Well, I think it's great, and for me, it's those who show themselves on the internet who have evil and disgusting souls, I feel sorry for them. My hair and nails will last as long as their trashy posts looking for likes.

I find I am actually a pretty disciplined thinker. A lot of this can be credited to my dad - whenever I would ask questions or for help, he'd make me think for myself. Whenever I'd try to talk about something with him, he'd apply a lot of scrutiny to what I'm saying, forcing a habit of being precise about everything I say. During family gatherings he'd dominate the conversation, take space, and clearly enjoy it a lot. It might sound like he's an insensitive asshole, and he absolutely is. He reminds me of picrelated (Bernkastel) a lot.

What would contribute to this further is online debating, which demanded precision and good argumentation even further. A lot of misogyny online (like women have no hobbies, can't do anything, etc), misogynistic statements would push me to prove myself, especially in nonfeminine interests.

The type of discipline my mind got is to always push further, to always look for not-so-obvious connections, synthesizing more and more, trying to pass everything I know on. This kind of thing. I am capable of hyperfocusing on tasks like research for hours because that's all I've been doing in my life, in no small part sue to social isolation also.

>>325217
And, I guess, this is something I'd like to pass on to the next generation, just like my father passed this onto me.

>>325217
So you're a professional redditor?

>>325222
Well, not professional because I'm not really paid to do it.

>>325122
holy based

>>325122
Too powerful…

Americans say living in a bankrupt warmongering police state is not their problem.

Ordering some seeds for big strawberries. This is gonna be good.

>>325216
she JUST. WON'T. STOP. GROWING.
she can't keep getting away with it

>>324917
TangTangMonster

>>324917
>>324945
And surprise surprise, he is gay.
His ass probably is the size of pingpong ball.

>>324907
I even developed a crush and a parasocial relationship with a famous cosplayer on Instagram. Her outfits, makeup, and edits were perfect. I was truly obsessed with her for months, I think even years, and I was shocked when I found out she was a woman, lol.

Finally some good fucking cosplay

Those guys are asian and asian girls love guys with feminine faces. I'm not sure how to feel about them as a westoid. They are pretty, but using a ton of makeup and filters, though I prefer them over a fat delusional sub 5 manlet who thinks he looks like chad (90% of male cosplayers)

I was reading a book on the subject of quantum physics recently and the amount of times the author said something along the lines of "scientists quickly realized there was an issue with their theory…so they made some shit up in order to make the theory work" had me laughing my ass off the entire time. It happened so often it became a gag and whenever the author pointed out an issue I'd say "let me guess, they just made some shit up" and sure enough I'd turn the page to find out they did in fact make some shit up. So of course I drew obvious parallels between modern academia and the religious shamans of old. To my surprise this very subject was touched upon by chance in some random lecture I was watching on YouTube. The important bit here is that according to said lecturer secret societies exist within all academic fields. Now naturally the connection between secret societies and the occult should be obvious and so this seemed to strengthen the idea that whether it be science or religion, humans ultimately rationalize our existence by making shit up. Now naturally this sent me in search of books on the occult and to my surprise there is documented evidence of many early scientists who were apparently well known members of secret societies at the time. I say all this to pose a simple question:

How much of modern academia is built off of the old structures established by the secret societies that predate it and how much of that structure still exists?

I suppose it's more of a rhetorical question to remind you to think for yourself regardless of how prestigious the organization behind the information you're consuming may be

Everything is illegal, everyone is a criminal, everyone is under surveillance 24/7, and no one cares.

Living in a police state means that you must live in dread of being arrested. You can't help feeling hopeless.

Saw this video recently which asserts that birth decline is most strongly associated not with women's rights, not even with how much it sucks to live in a particular environment, but smartphones. I think this is very interesting and I wanted to share it with more people.

>>325199
That's very interesting. I wonder if "secret society" is less sinister than what it sounds like. It makes sense people would get better results when they're sharing information amongst each other, so maybe this is the reason these early scientists were often part of their secret societies?

>So of course I drew obvious parallels between modern academia and the religious shamans of old.
Makes sense, one thing that really separates them is how strict/rationalist the tradition for "rituals" and "loremaking" has become.

>>325210
What a coincidence I was recommended the exact same video but have yet to watch it.

As to your point, the desire for secrecy certainly strongly implies the existence of heterodox and controversial beliefs but I don't necessarily believe secret societies need be malevolent. Not too far into the past, being part of a secret society was considered a symbol of status among the elite and thus many weren't shy about broadcasting their membership. I should hope it would be obvious how a relatively small group of people can influence the presentation of empirical data. It need not be strictly intentional for a group of people to subtly skew data to support their worldview. These posts are not a blanket rejection of science but a call to be skeptical of any and all information you might take as granted

>>115805
Test line

>>318872
Starting from man swamp ass?

If there's an apocalypse and most people die you have the opportunity to influence the culture by just completely making shit up. So there's something to look forward to after WW3.

You know how the brain runs on electric signals… so, what if like… we could control is with magnets and stuff. And run a wifi on it.

What if we just built houses using legos

Yes, like how many designer drinks I could buy from the front case by spending my entire paycheck.