>>334726
>>334724
Once you've experienced baby brain, you quickly understand why the moids violently opposed average women having positions of power. All of human history up until female birth control in the 1960s basically, we've been constantly pregnant or nursing, literally retarded due to hormones and brain chemistry in general, all in order to care for our children. I guess that's why ancient moids put much more stock in old matriarchs than young women, because the old crones could actually think straight. Nuns and other life-long virgin types too, they filled a "holy woman" role offering wisdom and sometimes leading, Deborah style.

>>335020
All of those things in your pic are objectively true of Western women’s current voting patterns, though. While those guys are obviously against women voting in principle, it’s not that crazy to identify voting blocs and get annoyed at their effects—it’s just not very democratic. For example, many Spanish anarchist women before the civil war advocated against the leftist government giving women the vote, since women at the time were more religious and conservative than men.
Point being, while a guy who doesn’t respect any opinion any woman has shouldn’t be trusted (and that isn’t inherent to conservatism, even if we grant that it’s an occupational hazard), it’s perfectly rational for a conservative woman to look at the voting patterns of women in every country for the past 40 years or so and conclude that her policy preferences would be better met if the group which happens to include her just didn’t vote. If she agreed with misogynist reasons to deny the vote, sure, there’s ample cause for concern, but you can come to the same conclusion just based on preferred outcomes.

>>335089
> it’s perfectly rational for a conservative woman to look at the voting patterns of women in every country for the past 40 years or so and conclude that her policy preferences would be better met if the group which happens to include her just didn’t vote. If she agreed with misogynist reasons to deny the vote, sure, there’s ample cause for concern, but you can come to the same conclusion just based on preferred outcomes.
Meanwhile the reasoning for being a based tradcon woman two replies above:
> I don’t want to fuck brown people

>>335020
I don't see the big deal.
I don't want to vote. I don't want to work. I'm very pain tolerate, I can handle an aggressive moid that wants a couple of children and just stay at home. Besides that I'm white. They won't let my genes go to waste or marry me off to some brown person.

>>335093
Another poster bringing up sex with brown people unprompted. What is going on in America? Are you all being pawned off to the cartel by democrats

Good luck

There’s absolutely zero chance for me as I’m a hikineet and just generally quite terrified of everyday things, not to mention romantic situations. I don’t think I’ve talked to a male in maybe a year and before that I was only really acquainted with a few within a larger mixed-gender space, but I guess if I were able to talk to people, I would answer your question with: I’d like a man who is first my friend for a long time. I would like to really know him. I’m very scared of sexual degenerates so I’d take it really slow and make sure to observe the man’s opinions on even the little things as it can be very telling. I would also need to feel on the same wavelength, there’s too many couples where you can tell they just settled for each other, and don’t think the same at all. We can have differences but if I often find myself thinking “What is he doing? Why is he being like this? What does it mean when he does this?” I would not date that man, too many misunderstandings seems tiresome for both parties, miscommunication could happen, but if you can’t understand the other’s logic, I wouldn’t bother. I’ve always wanted to meet someone at a library. I think a very chilled guy who likes literature would be good for me, as it is common ground. I think a dynamic where a man is so chill and secure that he doesn’t mind my awkwardness could cancel it out, and be quite cute. OP, maybe you have a hobby of some sorts that could lead to socialisation? It doesn’t even have to be a man, you could always be accepted into a friend circle from the hobby. I’ve heard many people find their boyfriends through friend-of-a-friends. I also think getting out of your comfort zone (I should take my own advice) could maybe open a path for you, I’m not saying go to spaces where you have no idea what is going on, but try new things, and think about hobbies or events that may have good men if you haven’t already. And good luck!! I believe in you and I hope you can find someone trustworthy and caring

>>334983
>I'm sick of people acting like not engaging in hookup culture and fucking random strangers off the street means you're anti-sex.
Unironically touch some grass

>>334985
You've clearly never met a pornsick fuckboy, never go on Tinder for your own sake and save your brain cells

Eh, in the end is just chasing a fairytale. These days I feel people struggle to form connections and find love so much virginity has lost a lot of the value it got when it was associated with a new stage of life xp and changing as a person, because the real thing that achieves that might not even be there.

>>302775
shaming men for virginity is just as bad, both create whore culture, you can't shame women for virginity while enabling men to be fuckboys

>>41822
If you care about your own children, don't lose your virginity to some rando b4 marriage. Kids don't deserve to be tainted with hoe heritage. And never ever marry a non-virgin moid.

>>334947
They live through internet games and gaming instead and buy food at the familymart everyday.

Hi this is Midwest Magic Cleaning, my name is Pepperoni Paula and today we are tackling a house full of trash covered in mouse poop and an interesting quantity of roaches

>>335027
god almighty just burn it down whats the point???

>>335080
how many stds does she get touching that stuff i wonder

she has to be super ultra vaccinated

>>335027
I used to know someone who cleaned obsessively like shed just spend a whole day cleaning, but she smoked meth lol

>>334411
She's always believed this and she's been friends with a troon from the start, she's against women's spaces being eroded by trannies and children getting trooned by insane parents
I wish she really hated troons as much as they think she does

>>331665
do you have the link to this post

I've always wondered why the pooner character looks like a harlequin baby

>>334411
this is her way of cleansing the gene pool

>>334411
It sucks that there's no middle ground. I agree with her. Really don't care if trannys exist, as long as they stay out of womens spaces.
And I guess I should also admit that if you're trans and you're an asshole I will call you slurs but I don't see the big deal with that.

>>335060
Tell him i only have mango fruit bars

have my autopen draw him a picture of ice cream
douse some vetiver on there
watch him unblinkingly lick paper

>>335061
let's try to have some fun instead of just talking about the meta, faggot

>>335061
Please create a fun 4chan post about Biden's dementia that gets good engagement. Make no mistakes

>>335071
I'm not an LLM—I'm a real human.
Imageboards are—places where ideas—are infinite.
Beep Bleep Boop Blop
It's not an LLM, it's a human trying to cause drama.

>>335074
Just to clarify, the human trying to cause drama wasn't me. I just want chill jokes about using ice cream for emotional regulation.

>>332171
They actually enjoy when it's man on woman too, the dark romance fags come out in droves in Pixel Fauxminism and /meta/ and other retarded places (picrel is from an /m/ thread) as if they're that many levels above Shayna's kidnapping daddy kinks even the hetcoom thread gets these retards sometimes, I just don't get it, at least when it also happens here I can just assume it's baiters being purposefully obtuse

>>335056
>the screencap
Holy incomprehensible and retarded babble. I doubt they can even read properly so of course they probably assume there’s nothing else to the media they “enjoy” besides their rape autopedophilia kink or whatever

>>335033
It's almost as if lolcow users document things as a hobby. Crazy

>>335062
Posting screenshots of things that made you upset is hardly a hobby

>>335064
What do you think lolcow was made for?

>>335048
That might be the move, but either way I think I'm losing both no matter what, and maybe I don't WANT to keep talking to her after this to be honest…
I've never seen or heard about a woman in a relationship rejecting someone because she had a boyfriend and and then trying to claw the guy back in while escalating things, it's like she instantly regretted it.


I just feel sickened by how she's treating her boyfriend, I would've never expected this from her, and this is just from what I've seen and what she has told me so I have to imagine the real thing is even worse.

>>335042
>EXCEPT that my friend texted HIM a couple of hours later.

LOL this slut was put in the spot and has been trying her absolute hardest to revert that.
That's just shameful, poor bf.

>>335043
B

>>335049
> I just feel sickened by how she's treating her boyfriend, I would've never expected this from her, and this is just from what I've seen and what she has told me so I have to imagine the real thing is even worse.

I don't understand. This is your own friend. Someone you're supposedly very close to. Don't you think it's possible that she could just simply be getting carried away?
Sorry Nona but if she's really your friend you'd have a little faith in her. You'd feel comfortable talking to her about your feelings. You're failing her by not coming forward.

Moved to >>>/feels/133666.

>>330286
Overruled, someone whose head got blown off can't set new rules up, gg, learn to accept the consequences of your immature red button pusher actions

>>330287
>implying i have only one head
GG

If everyone presses the red button, everyone survives, therefore if you press the blue button you have decided to most likely disappear

>>335029
It's guaranteed everyone vs not guaranteed everyone, blue is the obvious choice.

>>335029
its more complicated than that
its a "private" vote, meaning that no one can watch over or interfere with anyone elses vote. there are people out there that have mental or physical disabilities and just cant understand whats at stake, not to mention children. a significant amount of people will accidentally press the red button and tragically die

on the other hand though, if you believe in euthanasia having the option to press the red button is for the best


realistically if the red button is pressed more everyone compassionate and thinking out for the best
of those who cant think for themselves will die (this will obviously be bad for society in the aftermath)

if the blue button is pressed more often that means nothing happens besides people thinking it was a hoax